Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Family of Surfaces in 3-D Space

  1. Apr 6, 2014 #1

    I am currently reading a book where this showed up:

    The author gave a ##3## parameter equation (note ##Y## and ##y## are two separate variables):

    [tex]Y_1dy_1 + Y_2 dy_2 + Y_3dy_3 = 0[/tex]

    and states that this does not necessarily represent a family of surfaces in 3-D space and that only if the coefficient in the above equation satisfies (edit: the equation below should be partial derivatives, I can't have it changed for some reason):

    [tex]Y_1\left(\frac{dY_2}{dy_3} - \frac{dY_3}{dy_2}\right) + Y_2\left(\frac{dY_3}{dy_1} - \frac{dY_1}{dy_3}\right) + Y_3\left(\frac{dY_1}{dy_2} - \frac{dY_2}{dy_1}\right) = 0[/tex]

    Edit (Mark44): Is this what you meant?
    $$Y_1\left(\frac{\partial Y_2}{\partial y_3} - \frac{\partial Y_3}{\partial y_2}\right) + Y_2\left(\frac{\partial Y_3}{\partial y_1} - \frac{\partial Y_1}{\partial y_3}\right) + Y_3\left(\frac{\partial Y_1}{\partial y_2} - \frac{\partial Y_2}{\partial y_1}\right) = 0 $$
    I don't know the answer to your question, but thought I would edit your post for you.

    can the integral result in a family of surfaces. The example he gave was:

    [tex] y_1 dy_1 + y_2dy_2 + y_3dy_3 = 0[/tex]

    for which gives an set of spheres.

    I have no idea how he got from the first to the second equation. Can anyone help me out?

    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 15, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 16, 2014 #2
    Hi Mark44

    Yes the highlighted is what I meant, thank you for changing it
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Family of Surfaces in 3-D Space