Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Faster than light signal

  1. Jun 26, 2005 #1
    If I push a rigid object at one end, the whole rod should move instantaneously. Would this mean that a signal has been transmitted from the end which is pushed to the the far end faster than the speed of light?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 26, 2005 #2

    brewnog

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Nope, much slower. It's transmitted at the speed of sound for that material, which makes sense, seeing as sound travels merely by movement (well, vibration) of particles.
     
  4. Jun 26, 2005 #3

    Janus

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    There is no such thing as a perfectly rigid object. The rod will compress when you push it and that compression will travel the length of the rod at the speed of sound for the rod's material (at less than the speed of light), until it reaches the end and uncompresses. Net effect, you push your end, and at sometime later the other end of the rod moves. the time delay between the movement of the ends of the rod will always be longer than it would take for light to traverse the length of the rod.
     
  5. Jun 26, 2005 #4

    rcgldr

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I seem to remember something about splitting up pairs of electrons into opposing paths, and how one of them observed at one end affects the other?
     
  6. Jun 26, 2005 #5

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This thread is not about entanglement, and even though the thread topic is broad enough to accomodate that, let's stick to the content in the OP.
     
  7. Jun 27, 2005 #6
    I've seen this "thought experiment" come up on several forums, and it usually generates a lot of argument. I think the problem is that this question doesn't really have an answer, because once you start applying physical laws as restrictions to help you narrow down the possibilities, you have to change the nature of the question. I think it's really designed to get you thinking about what the laws really require of reality, and what the consequences are of the gaps between quantum mechanics and relativity. Not to get an interesting definite answer.

    The short answer is that it will take the amount of time required for the eletromagnetic force to transfer your pressure at one end from one atom to the next all the way down the rod. In other words, as someone already stated, the speed of sound is the factor. However, this assumes a certain amount of compressibility at the atomic level. Which means the rod isn't truly rigid. If the rod were perfectly rigid, then the answer to your question would be "yes". However, it would also have no physical significance, as the scenario varies so widely from anything possible in reality. Except maybe a neutron star, which some people think may be regarded as being as close as possible to being incompressible without collapsing to a black hole. It is thought that the speed of pressure waves (and hence sound) through neutron star material is very close to the speed of light.

    "Rigid" materials are good for messing around with ideal scenarios of laws which don't deal specifically with phenomena that are pushed to their limits by "rigid" materials.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2005
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Faster than light signal
  1. Sound faster than light? (Replies: 16)

  2. Faster than light? (Replies: 1)

  3. Faster than light (Replies: 11)

Loading...