Is Faster Than Light Travel Possible Through Black Holes?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of traveling faster than the speed of light, despite Einstein's theory stating it is impossible due to infinite mass. The conversation also touches on the idea of black holes and their effects on light and objects. It is mentioned that Newton's second law of motion, F=ma, suggests the possibility of exceeding the speed of light. However, this is refuted by the theory of special relativity, which explains that as an object approaches the speed of light, its acceleration decreases.
  • #1
kogaht
3
0
I know Einstein said it is impossible to travel faster than speed of light as the mass would get infinitely large. But if black holes exist and even a beam of light would be pulled back by gravity. Then Newton's 2nd law of motion, F=ma suggest faster than speed of light is possible.

can somebody explain what I am thinking wrong.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You didn't give a full statement of your reasoning. In any case, 'F = ma' must be modified for application at high speeds.
 
  • #3
On the other hand if a spaceship were to travel to Proxima Centauri from Earth at over 70% of the speed of light (from the Earth's perspective), he would reach Proxima Centauri in less than 4.3 years by his own clock, obviously faster than the speed of light.

(just kidding)
 
  • #4
Doc Al said:
You didn't give a full statement of your reasoning. In any case, 'F = ma' must be modified for application at high speeds.

Say light can be sucked by black holes then there must be a force to do so. Since there is a force acting to the light, then the light must be accelerating. So the speed of light plus the extra velocity gained by accelerating = faster than speed of light.

no?
 
  • #5
In GR, there's no force acting on an object in free fall. F=ma still makes sense, but the a is a measure of the deviation from geodesic (free-fall) motion.
 
  • #6
kogaht said:
I know Einstein said it is impossible to travel faster than speed of light as the mass would get infinitely large. But if black holes exist and even a beam of light would be pulled back by gravity.
Are you suggesting the idea that since "mass increases" as you approach the speed of light, then objects will turn into black holes before they can reach the speed of light? If so this is a misconception, see this entry from the Usenet Physics FAQ along with pervect's post #9 on this thread.
 
  • #7
kogaht said:
I know Einstein said it is impossible to travel faster than speed of light as the mass would get infinitely large. But if black holes exist and even a beam of light would be pulled back by gravity. Then Newton's 2nd law of motion, F=ma suggest faster than speed of light is possible.
can somebody explain what I am thinking wrong.

thanks.

The second law is a microcosm of SR. As v [itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] c, a gets asymptotically smaller to zero and is at "just before" zero "just before" v = c so an object is never "bumped up" to the speed of light.
 

1. Is it possible to travel faster than the speed of light?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, it is not possible to travel faster than the speed of light. The speed of light is considered to be the ultimate speed limit in the universe, and it would require infinite energy to reach and exceed this speed.

2. What happens if an object travels faster than the speed of light?

If an object were to somehow travel faster than the speed of light, it would violate the laws of physics as we know them. This would result in a breakdown of cause and effect, as the object would reach its destination before it even started its journey.

3. Can any particles travel faster than the speed of light?

No, according to our current understanding of physics, no particles can travel faster than the speed of light. Even particles that are thought to travel at high speeds, such as neutrinos, are still bound by the speed of light.

4. Is there any evidence of objects traveling faster than the speed of light?

No, there is no scientific evidence that supports the idea of objects traveling faster than the speed of light. In fact, all experiments conducted have shown that the speed of light is the ultimate speed limit in the universe.

5. Could the speed of light change in the future?

While it is currently believed that the speed of light is a constant in the universe, some theories suggest that it may have varied in the early stages of the universe. However, there is no evidence to support this and it remains a topic of debate and further research.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
608
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
595
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
Back
Top