I stumbled upon this document that discusses the single variable chain rule:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://math.rice.edu/~cjd/chainrule.pdf

At the bottom, there is an incorrect proof of the validity of the chain rule, but the author does not cite why the proof is wrong. I'm wondering if the problem is multiplying by g'(x)^-1 without assuming g'(x)~=0 for the relevant x.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Faulty proof of chain rule

Loading...

Similar Threads for Faulty proof chain | Date |
---|---|

B Proof of a limit rule | Dec 19, 2017 |

B Proof of quotient rule using Leibniz differentials | Jun 10, 2017 |

B Don't follow one small step in proof | Jun 10, 2017 |

Double Substitution Correct or Faulty? | Mar 7, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**