News Fear! Fear! Fear!

  • Thread starter pattylou
  • Start date
Is it just me, or is Bush's timing on sounding Bird Flu alarms a little coincidental?

"Bait and switch" and "distraction" and "Politics of fear" and "plummeting approval" all come to mind.

http://www.islandpacket.com/24hour/front/story/2861218p-11522755c.html [Broken]

Good God. Could the timing be any more obvious?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doesn't this sort of thing happen all the time with all sorts of politicians?
 
464
1
Well, it is just about to be flu season, and people should be somewhat worried I suppose.

It'd be alot more suspicious if he did this in the spring or something.
 
wasteofo2 said:
Well, it is just about to be flu season, and people should be somewhat worried I suppose.
I haven't seen any reports indicating that a mutation to a more humanly-contagious form is more likely to happen during flu season.
 
TheStatutoryApe said:
Doesn't this sort of thing happen all the time with all sorts of politicians?
Does this excuse the behavior? If people are being baited, wouldn't they like to be aware of it?
 
pattylou said:
Does this excuse the behavior? If people are being baited, wouldn't they like to be aware of it?
Personally I just take the propaganda for granted. I don't see anyone out there in the political arena genuinely saying that they are done with it. I have become jaded and don't listen to politicians any more because I want to hear facts instead of spin and propaganda.
The day someone says "Hey check this guy out! He's completely honest and tells it how it is!" I just may start paying attention. Until then I'll stick to reading or listening to the news.
 
TheStatutoryApe said:
Personally I just take the propaganda for granted. I don't see anyone out there in the political arena genuinely saying that they are done with it. I have become jaded and don't listen to politicians any more because I want to hear facts instead of spin and propaganda.
The day someone says "Hey check this guy out! He's completely honest and tells it how it is!" I just may start paying attention. Until then I'll stick to reading or listening to the news.
Unfortunately, that would be political suicide in the first 5 minutes.
 

Pengwuino

Gold Member
4,854
10
I believe the NY Times is reporting that Canadian health officials have detected the virus in their country. I wonder why you haven't criticized every other politician who has done this... well I know i know, i don't actually wonder, i already know... its just a hypothetical question.

If he didn't say anything, I'm utterly convinced you would say "Why hasn't Bush said anything about the flu????"
 

SOS2008

Gold Member
18
0
I feel Bush needs to address pandemic disease and preparedness. Recent increase in outbreaks justifies the timing, IMO. I’m glad to see his focus move off of military quarantine to vaccinations, though I question the plan on this, and how comprehensive his plan is. I assume there is review of medical facilities, etc., but haven’t heard.

As for timing, I find his appeasement of the religious right on his SC nomination more questionable. An all out civil brawl is almost as good as a war to distract people from poor performance and/or scandals.
 
106
4
As much as I support Bush, I am seeing a pattern here:

When things get tough, start spending money.

But, it could turn out to be one of those things that we sure would hate to not have in place if it becomes needed. He has been burned enough for not being prepared for crap.
 
Pengwuino said:
I believe the NY Times is reporting that Canadian health officials have detected the virus in their country.
The report I heard has said that it likely isn't H5N1.
I wonder why you haven't criticized every other politician who has done this...
?? Done what? Asked for 7.1 billion dollars immediately following White House scandal, for an unrelated threat that has held roughly steady over the last year? As far as I have seen, every other country has been talking about bird flu ever since it was found in Asia in early 2004. Bush hasn't, until today. In other words, they weren't spinning it, and he is using it to bait you.
If he didn't say anything, I'm utterly convinced you would say "Why hasn't Bush said anything about the flu????"
As bird flu has been in the news ever since the SARS scare, one would think I have had plenty of time to say such a thing, and yet I haven't.

But as soon as Bush proposed this bird flu scare, I spoke out - and the reason I speak out is because of the timing. He is playing the American people. It's unconscionable. Wake up.

Please don't put words in my mouth. I certainly don't do that to you. I expect an apology.
 
Last edited:
SOS2008 said:
Recent increase in outbreaks justifies the timing, IMO.
What outbreaks? I don't believe the frequency of human cases is increasing over a year ago, for example.

Bird flu hit the scene spring of 2004. Human cases occur with steady regularity. If there has been a recent increase, can you point me towards towards a reference demonstrating such?
 
Also, the scientists have maintained all along that they will not be able to predict when bird flu will mutate. It could take years.

Bush is making a gamble, and if nothing else it might be interesting to see how it plays out in the next election cycle or two.
 
deckart said:
As much as I support Bush, I am seeing a pattern here:
When things get tough, start spending money.
Hallelujah! We agree. :) I'd say when things get rough, he also sounds terror alarms. To boost support.

Remember how many code orange/yellow/red/alerrts we had in the months before the elections? We have only had one scare since then, in New York (and was there even a terror alert issued???)

But, it could turn out to be one of those things that we sure would hate to not have in place if it becomes needed.
Agreed. Just like the possibility of human - driving of climate change. Be a shame to realize too late that we didn't prevent it when we could.
 
pattylou said:
What outbreaks? I don't believe the frequency of human cases is increasing over a year ago, for example.
Bird flu hit the scene spring of 2004. Human cases occur with steady regularity. If there has been a recent increase, can you point me towards towards a reference demonstrating such?
I think that one problem is that nobody is using the right terms.

H5N1
Bird Flu
SARS

So what are we talking about folks?

Just becasue I have a dead canary on my doorstep doesn't mean I am going to get sick.
 
Still, I'd feel a lot better if the Surgeon General were the one letting us know what's going on instead of, you know.
 
Echo 6 Sierra said:
Still, I'd feel a lot better if the Surgeon General were the one letting us know what's going on instead of, you know.
Point taken ... where is he anyway?

You'd think this was within his scope and yet you have Bush flapping his gums as if he knew something about it.

Probably find that the Surgeon General is like the Head of FEMA and once read the back of a Contac-C box.

They're going to drop Halls lozenges and Vicks inhalers into Montana.
 

SOS2008

Gold Member
18
0
deckart said:
As much as I support Bush, I am seeing a pattern here:
When things get tough, start spending money.

But, it could turn out to be one of those things that we sure would hate to not have in place if it becomes needed. He has been burned enough for not being prepared for crap.
Let’s not forget there already was a shortage of flu vaccine during Bush’s watch. And yes, he seems to throw money (yours and mine) at problems to make himself look better.
pattylou said:
What outbreaks? I don't believe the frequency of human cases is increasing over a year ago, for example.

Bird flu hit the scene spring of 2004. Human cases occur with steady regularity. If there has been a recent increase, can you point me towards towards a reference demonstrating such?
Outbreak was probably not the best word—I think there have been 65 deaths so far—mostly in Asia. How many total cases in how many countries in what time frame is a good question.

In this evening’s news, there are some in the media who feel Bush is capitalizing on the situation. The speech is old news in that congress already addressed this last week, and the word pandemic was repeated numerous times in his speech. So though concern about pandemics is legitimate, it appears there is some continuation of the fear-mongering MO of this administration.
 
The Smoking Man said:
I think that one problem is that nobody is using the right terms.
H5N1
Bird Flu
SARS
So what are we talking about folks?
Just becasue I have a dead canary on my doorstep doesn't mean I am going to get sick.
As I understand it, H and N refer to particular proteins on the Avian Influenza A virus. The lethal form of avian influenza (bird flu) has the version of H that is called 5, and the version of N that is called 1. So, that strain is called H5N1.

The canadian birds that appeared healthy and yet had an influenza infection, did not appear to be carrying H5N1, but rather a different influenza.

There are other bird flus, which are of less concern. Presumably there are *lots* of other bird flus. Viral "species" outnumber bacterial species, by boatloads. - to give you an idea of how many viruses we live with on a daily basis.

The virus that caused the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918 shares genetic similarity to H5N1 Avian Influenza.

~~~~~~

SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) is also caused by a virus - but a completely different one. In this case, the disease is caused by a coronavirus (a different viral family, from Flu.)

There have been over 8,000 reported cases of SARS, and 774 fatalities. There have been close to 200 cases in the US alone.

http://www.wadsworth.org/resnres/bios/wentworth.htm [Broken]

These numbers indicate that SARS is a greater health threat than Bird Flu. Although the mortality is "only" around 10%, it spreads from person to person with fair ease.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gokul43201

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,987
14
The Smoking Man said:
Unfortunately, that would be political suicide in the first 5 minutes.
<offtopic>It wasn't, for one Paul Wellstone. </offtopic>
 
Last edited:
29
0
TheStatutoryApe said:
Personally I just take the propaganda for granted. I don't see anyone out there in the political arena genuinely saying that they are done with it. I have become jaded and don't listen to politicians any more because I want to hear facts instead of spin and propaganda.
The day someone says "Hey check this guy out! He's completely honest and tells it how it is!" I just may start paying attention. Until then I'll stick to reading or listening to the news.
his name is howard dean
 
MaxS said:
his name is howard dean
Stop the Spin
Whatever happens today, one thing is clear: we need a change in our nation's capital.

The culture of corruption in Washington is toxic. Already, the White House has started its spin machine, throwing out bogus talking points about "an overzealous prosecutor" and "the criminalization of politics." You know what? We need to quit playing that game.

On Wednesday, November 2, join DNC Chair Howard Dean and DFA Chair Jim Dean on a conference call to discuss how to change the culture of corruption in Washington. Sign up on DFA-Link for a conference call event in your area:




It grows clearer by the day that the President's advisors were willing to do anything to quiet opposition to the war—even if it meant breaking laws designed to protect our national security. And it leaves us questioning: what other deceptions and mistruths did they tell to lead us into war? If we want the truth, we need to demand answers.

Join the conference call with Governor Dean and Jim Dean next week. If you can't find an event in your area, invite some friends over and join the conference call from home:

http://www.dfalink.com/ [Broken]

It's time for the truth. It's time to take our country back: neighbor to neighbor, friend to friend, from the ground up.

RSVP for the conference call with DNC Chair Howard Dean and DFA Chair Jim Dean today:

http://www.dfalink.com/ [Broken]

Sincerely,
Tom Hughes
Democracy for America
From his own site...
Is this some how not just the bunch of rhetoric it looks like?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
29
0
Uh actually no.. in case you haven't noticed (which wouldn't be at all surprising) the entire republican administration IS rather rife with corruption, and the Bush administration DID lead us into a war of aggression based entirely on lies. In fact a few of the many players are now going down. So no its not just rhetoric its the truth.
 

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,093
173
Has anyone noticed that in the case of bird flu and Katrina, Bush keeps trying to increase the role of the military here in the US?
 

SOS2008

Gold Member
18
0
Ivan Seeking said:
Has anyone noticed that in the case of bird flu and Katrina, Bush keeps trying to increase the role of the military here in the US?
I brought this up some time ago in another thread. It always feels like he’s looking for a reason for martial law, which is fascist. Now where was that thread about the Patriot Act?…
 

Related Threads for: Fear! Fear! Fear!

  • Posted
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
12
Views
2K
Q
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • Posted
Replies
10
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top