Fearing AI: Possibility of Sentient Self-Autonomous Robots

[russ_watters]

ChatGPT is making people more money and better at their jobs. 4 of them break down how.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/chatgpt-making-people-more-money-114549005.html

AI is simply a tool, which can be used properly/productively or misused destructively.

I'm having trouble finding a kind way to critique 3 of those jobs, but 1 out of 4 isn't too bad if you're a baseball player. The others, yup, that's how they'll be replaced and it's a little surprising to me that the internet didn't replace them already.

 

[256bits]

If with all the hype about ChatGpt, and the bandwagon forming around it.
It is as if everyone is being sucked in, under the false belief that ChatGPT is infallible ( as well as other AI's out there present and future ).
That is the AI problem that will 'kiill' humanity IMO - Not an AI of superintelligence that will try to protect us from ourselves.
If we can't know what information is correct, as humans we will take the easy way out by just assuming that ChatGPT says, so so it must be true.

Sorry to pick on ChatGPT, but it is giving the true nature of what the AI modelling has unleashed upon the world.

The thing make stuff up, but appears to present the information as if an expert.
A typical mis-information route from ChatGPT.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/new...1&cvid=e967eb65af174e2ebd8b2d04a08b8db8&ei=12
A quote from the article of typical things that ChatGPT does,
The Research On ChatGPT Inaccuracies: This growing concern was brought into sharp focus by the study "High Rates of Fabricated and Inaccurate References in ChatGPT-Generated Medical Content," conducted by Mehul Bhattacharyya, Valerie M. Miller, Debjani Bhattacharyya and Larry E. Miller.

Through an analysis of 30 medical papers generated by ChatGPT-3.5, each containing at least three references, the researchers uncovered startling results: of the 115 references generated by the AI, 47% were completely fabricated, 46% were authentic but used inaccurately and only 7% were authentic and accurate.

Their findings reflect the larger concern that ChatGPT is capable of not only creating fabricated citations, but whole articles and bylines that never existed. This propensity, known as “hallucination,” is now seen as a significant threat to the integrity of information across many fields.