Feasibility of fission reactor at centre of Earth

In summary, a paper by J Marvin Herndon suggests the feasibility of a fission reactor at the center of the Earth that could generate the geomagnetic field. However, someone in New Scientist magazine argues that due to low gravitational forces at the Earth's center, heavy chemicals would not separate out as Herndon suggests. The inner core of the Earth is solid under extreme pressure, but unstable isotopes such as 40K continue to generate heat through radioactivity. Some believe this is the main source of heat for the core, while others have different theories. One such theory suggests that the inner core does not have to be solid if the temperature is high enough. However, the inner core is solid because s-waves travel through it and p
  • #1
verdigris
119
0
There's a a paper by J Marvin Herndon about the feasibility of a fission reactor about 5 miles wide at the centre of the Earth,which could generate the geomagnetic field.Someone said in New Scientist magazine that because gravitational forces are nearly zero at the Earth's centre then the heavy chemicals mentioned by Hearndon wouldn't separate out on the basis of density as he suggests.

http://www.understandearth.com/Herndon%20JGG93.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quite right indeed. Moreover the inner core is solid under the extreme pressure. However, all the unstable isotopes anywhere within the Earth, perhaps most abundantly 40K just continue their usual radioactivity and thus generate heat. Some think that this process is the main cause of the heat of the core after initial cooling.

Others have other ideas of course.

qhttp://nujournal.net/core.pdf[/URL]
Just showing it for educational purposes, how far one can go scaremongering in order to get into the limelight.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Andre said:
"the inner core is solid under the extreme pressure. "

Solid lumps of uranium do naturally undergo fission such as those found in 1972 in a mine at Oklo, Gabon.But the neutrons need to be slowed down (at Oklo water was the moderating material).There are many elements that can act as moderators - carbon is one.Also the core of the Earth does not have to be solid if the core temperature is high enough.Some moderating materials have atoms displaced by neutrons and these atoms stay in the moderating material with high potential energy that can suddenly be released by a temperature rise(Wigner enrgy that caused the fire at Windscale).
 
Last edited:
  • #4
verdigris said:
Andre said:
Also the core of the Earth does not have to be solid if the core temperature is high enough.

The inner core is solid because s-waves travel through; the p-wave loses energy in the form of an s-wave at the liquid/solid, outer/inner core boundary. This happens because p and so-called sv- waves form a coupled system.
 

1. What is a fission reactor and how does it work?

A fission reactor is a type of nuclear reactor that uses the process of nuclear fission to generate energy. In this process, atoms of a radioactive material, typically uranium, are split apart, releasing large amounts of heat energy. This heat is then used to create steam, which drives turbines to produce electricity.

2. Is it possible to build a fission reactor at the centre of the Earth?

No, it is not currently feasible to build a fission reactor at the centre of the Earth. The extreme temperatures and pressures at the Earth's core would make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to construct and maintain a reactor. Additionally, the high levels of radioactivity in the core would pose significant safety and environmental risks.

3. What are the potential benefits of a fission reactor at the centre of the Earth?

Theoretically, a fission reactor at the centre of the Earth could provide an unlimited source of energy, as the core of the Earth contains vast amounts of uranium and other radioactive materials. It could also potentially help to stabilize the Earth's magnetic field, which is generated by the core's movements.

4. What are the potential risks of a fission reactor at the centre of the Earth?

Aside from the technical challenges of building and maintaining a reactor at the Earth's core, there are also significant safety and environmental concerns. The high levels of radioactivity and extreme temperatures could lead to catastrophic accidents and the release of harmful radiation into the Earth's atmosphere. Additionally, any disruptions to the Earth's core could have unpredictable and potentially disastrous consequences for the planet.

5. Are there any alternative sources of energy that could be used at the Earth's core?

While a fission reactor may not be feasible at the Earth's core, there are other potential sources of energy that could be harnessed. These include geothermal energy, which utilizes the Earth's natural heat to produce electricity, and fusion energy, which uses the same process that powers the sun to generate energy. However, both of these technologies also face significant technical challenges and are not currently viable options for energy production at the Earth's core.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
57K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top