I've been thinking recently about a weird puzzle in algebraic and(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

constructive QFT. Namely, when one combines the conclusions of two

central theorems, one arrives at a seemingly absurd result: that free

and interacting quantum fields are experimentally indistinguishable.

Fell's theorem implies that any state can be approximated arbitrarily

closely (in the weak*-topology) by Fock states. Measuring the

expectation values of any finite set of observables in the C*-algebra

of observables, up to some finite degree of accuracy, will only

determine the state to within a weak*-neighborhood.

This would seem to imply that no finite number of experiments can

determine whether a given state is a Fock state or not.

Haag's theorem implies that no interacting state is in the same folium

as any free state, and therefore that no interacting state is a Fock

state.

So, if (by Fell's Thm) we can't rule out the possibility that any

given state is a Fock state, then (by Haag's Thm) we can't rule out

the possibility that any given state is a free/noninteracting state.

Something has to be wrong with this reasoning, but what?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Fell's Thm and Haag's Thm: How do we know there are interactions?

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

- Similar discussions for: Fell's Thm and Haag's Thm: How do we know there are interactions?

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**