I'm talking about neither his "last theorem" nor his "little theorem", but another one. He suggested that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

x^2+2=y^3 can only have one solution (if we're dealing in natural numbers), which was (5,3). Euler reproved the theorem since, like so many others of his, the proof was lost. I can't find the proof now, but I remember it had to do with complex numbers and relative primes.

I did some work with the theorem myself in my free time last summer, and I think I found a proof of it using infinite descent. I can't be certain my proof is correct since I haven't had the chance to have anyone review it, and I'm also not sure if anyone else has proven the theorem in a similar way. Does anyone know if it has? I'm especially proud because I think this is probably the way in which Fermat would have proven the theorem.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fermat's theorem

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Fermat's theorem | Date |
---|---|

I Fermat's Little Theorem ... Anderson and Feil, Theorem 8.7 . | Feb 26, 2017 |

Question on Fermat's Last Theorem | Aug 17, 2012 |

Is this a short, marvelous proof of Fermat's Last Theorem? | Jul 21, 2012 |

Does the elegant proof to the Fermats last theorem exists? | Jul 3, 2012 |

So is chike obo proof of fermat's last theorem | Apr 22, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**