How to find the normalization constant of Fermi-Dirac distribution function?

In summary, the Fermi-Dirac distribution function gives the average occupation of an orbital and does not have a normalization constant to be calculated. The Boltzmann probability distribution function, on the other hand, has a normalization constant called the partition function which is denoted by Z and is given by ∑ exp[-βEi]. The density of states function for a single particle is given by Z = ∫g(E) exp[-βE]dE. The 2/h3 factor mentioned in some books is part of the density of states function and is not a normalization constant. The Fermi-Dirac distribution function is not a probability distribution and it gives the average occupation of an energy level or orbital. The factor
  • #1
akk
7
0
How to find the normalization constant of Fermi-Dirac distribution function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am not sure what you are referring to, but the F-D function gives the average occupation of an orbital:

<n> = 1 / [exp β(e - μ) + 1]. There are no normalization constants. I gave standard symbols. β is 1/kBT, where kB is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the absolute temperature, μ is the chemical potential.
 
  • #3
dismb2.gif
, here A is the normalization constant for Mazwellian distribution. The normalization constnt for Fermi-Dirac is 2/{h}^{3},,where h is Planck's constant. but i don't know how to normalize..don't know formula
 
  • #4
OK. The formula you pictured, is the Boltzmann probability distribution function. The normalization constant A in that case, is called the partition function, usually denoted by the letter Z. It is given by:

Z = ∑ exp[-βEi]. The summation is over all possible states. Ei is the energy of the state i. For each system, you need to know energies of all the states in order to calculate Z. If, as is the case for a classical gas, the energies are continuously distributed, the summation becomes an integral:

Z = ∫g(E) exp[-βE]dE where g(E) is the density of states function. This is the partition function for a single particle.
 
  • #5
Chandra Prayaga said:
OK. The formula you pictured, is the Boltzmann probability distribution function. The normalization constant A in that case, is called the partition function, usually denoted by the letter Z. It is given by:

Z = ∑ exp[-βEi]. The summation is over all possible states. Ei is the energy of the state i. For each system, you need to know energies of all the states in order to calculate Z. If, as is the case for a classical gas, the energies are continuously distributed, the summation becomes an integral:

Z = ∫g(E) exp[-βE]dE where g(E) is the density of states function. This is the partition function for a single particle.
Sorry. Just to add: The Fermi-Dirac distribution function is not a probability distribution. It gives the average occupation of an energy level, or orbital, and does not have a normalization constant to be calculated.
 
  • #6
Thanks,, i may be wrong, but i found in many books that its normalization constant is
2\{h}^{3},,here 2 is due to two possible vales of the fermion spin and h is the volume of a quantum state in the phase space.
 
  • #7
The 2/h3 is part of the density of states function that I gave in my earlier post. If you could mention one or two of the books that you saw this in, perhaps I can clear it up for you.
 
  • #8
ASTROPHYSICS PROCESSES by
HALE BRADT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
 
  • #9
I am afraid I don't have access to that book. But perhaps this will help you:

The partition function Z which I gave in post #5 above can be evaluated for an ideal gas. It is given by:

Z = (V/ħ3) (mkBT/2π)3/2. So the constants that you mentioned above are indeed part of the partition function, which is the normalization factor for the probability distribution function.
 
  • #10
thanks
 
  • #11
It depends a bit on the conventions used by your textbook. Of course, the physics is unique. Suppose we have a (spin-saturated) Fermi gas consisting of particles with spin ##s## (which is necessarily a number ##s \in \{1/2,3/2,/\ldots \}## because of the spin-statistics theorem). Then the average number of particles per unit phase space is given by
$$\frac{\mathrm{d} N}{\mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{p}} =f(\vec{p}) = \frac{g}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3} \frac{1}{1+\exp[\beta (E(\vec{p})-\mu)]},$$
where ##\mu## is a chemical potential for some conserved particle number (non-relativistic physics) or charge (relativistic physics), and ##E(\vec{p})## is the energy of a single particle as a function of its momentum. In relativistic physics one usually includes the rest energy in ##E##, so that you have ##E(\vec{p})=\sqrt{m^2 c^4+\vec{p}^2 c^2}##, while in non-relativistic physics you usually use the simple kinetic energy ##E(\vec{p})=\vec{p}^2/(2m)##. In both cases ##m## is the same invariant mass of the particle. Further ##\beta=1/k_{\text{B}} T##, where ##T## is the absolute temperature of the gas, and ##g=2s+1## is the spin degeneracy factor of the particles.

You don't need any arbitrary normalization constant here, because this just counts the number of quantum states per unit phase space, and this is determined from quantum theory uniquely. The equilibrium distribution then follows from maximizing the von Neumann-Shannon-Jaynes entropy of the corresponding statistical operator (here I work with the grand-canonical operator).

The semiclassical limit, leads to the Boltzmann equation, which is valid when the average particle occupation numbers are all very small compared to ##1##. Then you can neglect the 1 in the denominator of the Fermi distribution, and you get the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
$$f(\vec{p})=\frac{g}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3} \exp[-\beta(E(\vec{p})-\mu)].$$
It is remarkable that there is the Planck action appearing in this classical formula. The reason is that in classical statistics we do not have a natural measure for phase-space cells, and the normalization is indeed arbitrary, but that on the other hand almost always does not matter, because here you can simply take an arbitrary normalization and use the fugacity factor ##z=A \exp(\beta \mu)##. The natural choice for ##A## can only be inferred from quantum theory and is given by ##g/[(2 \pi \hbar)^3]##.
 
  • Like
Likes akk
  • #12
Thank you very much . So basically the factor 1/{h^3} is not a normalization constant. It the volume element of a quantum state in phase space. and we do not get it by integration.
The Fermi-Dirac distribution function is
\begin{equation}
f(E)=\frac{1}{e^\frac{{E-E_{F}}}{k_{B}T}+1},
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}%\label{}
~~\mbox{when}~~~~~~ T\rightarrow0

~~~~f(E)=
\Big\{
\begin{array}{rcl}
&&1~~~~~~~ E<E_{F}\\
&&0~~~~~~~ E>E_{F}.
\end{array}
\end{equation}
If i write it in terms of momentum and normalize it i get
\begin{equation}\label{}
n=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}f(p)d^{3}p.
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{}
n=4\pi\int^{p_{F}}_{0}p^{2}dp.
\end{equation}
it gives me expression for the fermi momentum instead of $(\frac{2}{2\pi \hbar})^{3}$.
\begin{equation}\label{}
n_{0}=\frac{p_{F}^{3}}{3\pi^{2}\hbar^{3}}.
\end{equation}
and that was mine confusion.
 
  • #13
The particle density is given by
$$n=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{\mathrm{d}^3 \vec{p}}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3} f_{\text{F}}(\vec{p}),$$
where
$$f_{\text{F}}(\vec{p})=\frac{g}{1+\exp[\beta (E(\vec{p})-\mu)]}.$$
For ##T \rightarrow 0##, i.e., ##\beta \rightarrow \infty## you get
$$f_{\text{F}}(\vec{p})=\Theta[\mu-E(\vec{p})].$$
For the non-relativistic particle this implies
$$n=\frac{g}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3} 4 \pi \int_0^{p_{\text{F}}} \mathrm{d} p p^2=\frac{g}{2 \pi^2 \hbar^3} \frac{p_{\text{F}}^3}{3}.$$
The Fermi momentum is determined by
$$\frac{p_{\text{F}}^2}{2m}=\mu \; \Rightarrow \; p_{\text{F}}=\sqrt{2 m \mu}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes akk

1. What is the Fermi-Dirac distribution and what does it represent?

The Fermi-Dirac distribution is a statistical distribution that describes the probability of a particle occupying a certain energy state in a system at thermal equilibrium. It is commonly used to describe the behavior of fermions, such as electrons, in a system.

2. How is the Fermi-Dirac distribution different from other statistical distributions?

The Fermi-Dirac distribution differs from other distributions, such as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, in that it takes into account the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state. This results in a different distribution of particles at higher energy levels compared to the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

3. What is the significance of the Fermi level in the Fermi-Dirac distribution?

The Fermi level, also known as the Fermi energy, is the energy level at which there is a 50% chance of finding a particle in a given state. It is a key parameter in the Fermi-Dirac distribution as it determines the average energy of particles in a system at thermal equilibrium.

4. How does temperature affect the shape of the Fermi-Dirac distribution curve?

As temperature increases, the Fermi-Dirac distribution curve becomes broader and flatter. This is because at higher temperatures, there is a higher chance of particles occupying higher energy states, leading to a more gradual decrease in probability as energy increases compared to lower temperatures.

5. In what areas of science is the Fermi-Dirac distribution commonly used?

The Fermi-Dirac distribution is commonly used in the fields of condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics to describe the behavior of fermions in various systems, such as semiconductors, metals, and gases. It also has applications in astrophysics, as it can be used to model the distribution of particles in stars and other celestial bodies.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top