1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Fermi Dirac probability

  1. Sep 9, 2016 #1
    Hi dear friends
    Please reffer to my work , I did part ( a ) 20160909_171333.jpg 20160909_171413.jpg only
    Could you please help me to do part ( b )
    I don't know how to do it.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 9, 2016 #2

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    (a) is correct.
    (b): If p is the fraction of electrons in the conduction band (at energy EG/2) & coming from the valence band, what would be the fraction of holes left behind in the valence band, seeing as those electrons came from the top of the valence band?
    Hint: no electrons going to the conduction band ⇒no missing holes!
     
  4. Sep 9, 2016 #3
    Thanks rude man.....
    I'm not getting what you mean. ....
    Can you explain it in a different way or show on a diagram. ...
     
  5. Sep 10, 2016 #4

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I may work on this some more but I think you should post this in the advanced physics section where I think it belongs. I covered this material many years ago in a graduate course (taught by a future Nobelist!).
     
  6. Sep 10, 2016 #5
    Then the equation may change to the below 20160910_112813.jpg

    I guess. .
    If this is correct then we have to write an equation for W h in term of Wg and Wf to eliminate Wf.
    What will be that equation?
     
  7. Sep 10, 2016 #6
    How to shift this post to the advanced physic section?
     
  8. Sep 10, 2016 #7

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    OK, after a bit more perusal on my part:

    My textbook gives the probability distribution for holes as not W(p) as it is for electrons, but as 1 - W(p). Without a believable rationale, but I'm sure it's correct, because later on they use that expression for deriving the totality of free carriers for electrons and for holes and get roughly the same number for each, which has to be correct. That was supposed to be my hint in post 2 but as I say it wasn't based on good argument.

    So, bottom line, if you use 1 - W(p) for the holes, and use Wv in lieu of Wc, and proceedig exactly as you did in part (a), you will get your answer. Do that and let us know what you come up with.

    I am going to ask a moderator to move your post to the advanced physics section for you.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2016
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Fermi Dirac probability
  1. Quasi Fermi Levels (Replies: 0)

Loading...