Fermi Level in N-Type Semiconductors

In summary, the user is asking if it is possible for the quasi-Fermi level for holes (F sub p) to be above the intrinsic level for the conductor (E sub i) in a steady-state semiconductor doped n-type. Some confusion arises due to the use of different terminology in EE, but it is possible for the quasi-Fermi level for holes to be above the intrinsic level in this scenario, especially in cases of optical generation. It is suggested to consult someone with in-depth knowledge on the subject for confirmation.
  • #1
dink
31
0
This is sort of a simple question. In a steady-state semiconductor doped n-type, is it possible for the quasi-Fermi level for the holes (F sub p) to be above the intrinsic level for the conductor (E sub i)? That is, E - F = (negative value)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
dink said:
This is sort of a simple question. In a steady-state semiconductor doped n-type, is it possible for the quasi-Fermi level for the holes (F sub p) to be above the intrinsic level for the conductor (E sub i)? That is, E - F = (negative value)?

Maybe there's some special terminology being used in EE, but this question is rather odd.

1. n-type semiconductor has electrons as the majority charge carrier. So why is there a Fermi level for holes?

2. Usually, the Fermi level is the outcome of the WHOLE population of charge carriers, and not a combination of Fermi level for electrons plus Fermi level for holes, i.e. they can't be separated.

3. What is "the intrinsic level for the conductor"? What conductor? Where did this conductor come from since you are talking about a semiconductor. There isn't an intrinsic level for a conductor.

Zz.
 
  • #3
Zz, I'm not terribly familiar with this, but the EE folks do have such a thing as a Quasi-Fermi Level for electrons and holes separately. I believe it is some non-equilibrium parameter when a current is flowing through a SC.
 
  • #4
Well, this person did say that it is in a steady state. So that can't be it.

Zz.
 
  • #5
ZapperZ said:
Maybe there's some special terminology being used in EE, but this question is rather odd.
1. n-type semiconductor has electrons as the majority charge carrier. So why is there a Fermi level for holes?
2. Usually, the Fermi level is the outcome of the WHOLE population of charge carriers, and not a combination of Fermi level for electrons plus Fermi level for holes, i.e. they can't be separated.
3. What is "the intrinsic level for the conductor"? What conductor? Where did this conductor come from since you are talking about a semiconductor. There isn't an intrinsic level for a conductor.
Zz.

Yes there is a special terminology used in EE

1.See in EE we use the quasi Fermi levels (both 'F sub n' for electrons and 'F sub p' for holes) as a replacement for the equilibrium Fermi level (E sub F) in the steady state analysis
since the equilibrium Fermi level can only be used to described a doped material in an equilibrium state the quasi Fermi levels are used to describe the electron and hole concentration in the steady state with respect to the equilibrium Fermi level
an example of this is when the semiconductor is optically exited
when the the generation rate reach the steady state,
both the generation of electron and holes can be studied by computing the derivation of the quasi Fermi levels from the original Fermi level.

2.I think 1 answers that.

3.Again in EE we seem to refer to semiconductors as conductors, I know it's wrong but that's just the way it goes.


Well, this person did say that it is in a steady state. So that can't be it.

Zz.



I think you have mistaken that with thermal equilibrium a semiconductor can be under current and in a steady state if the current in it, is in a steady state i.e there is no change in the generation or recombination rate of carriers


This is sort of a simple question. In a steady-state semiconductor doped n-type, is it possible for the quasi-Fermi level for the holes (F sub p) to be above the intrinsic level for the conductor (E sub i)? That is, E - F = (negative value)?

I am not sure of this answer so don't take it as your final, but i think that if the material is heavily doped and that the excitation source applied to it does not give that much energy there is no reason why this could not happen but as i said don't take my answer for granted try to ask someone with a PhD and come back to say if i was right or wrong.
 
  • #6
Eeeewww... I should have just stayed away and not looked in here!

:)

Zz.
 
  • #7
Thanks for the replies guys. I think it is possible since I can't find any outstanding errors in my math or my assumptions.
 
  • #8
Eeeewww... I should have just stayed away and not looked in here!

:)

Zz.

Why?


Thanks for the replies guys. I think it is possible since I can't find any outstanding errors in my math or my assumptions.

Like i said don't take that for granted sometimes there is more things to take into account than you've learned so you'd better ask someone who has in depth knowledge of the subject more than you...
 
  • #9
Well, my solid state textbook (Streetman's) defines the quasi-Fermi level for holes with the following statement:
[tex]E_i - F_p = k T \ln{\frac{p}{n_i}}[/tex]
So, for the difference to be negative, the number of holes would have to be less than the intrinsic number of holes. In an n-type semiconductor, this is definitely possible, so I would say that yes, the quasi-Fermi level for holes can be above the intrinsic level.

For example, consider steady-state optical generation. As the optical generation rate approaches zero, the semiconductor behaves more and more like it is at equilibrium. In that case, [itex]p[/itex] approaches [itex]p_0[/itex], the equilibrium value, and the above equation becomes equivalent to the relation for semiconductors at equilibrium. Hence, in this case, both the quasi-Fermi level for holes and electrons approach the equilibrium Fermi level, which for n-type material, is clearly above the intrinsic value.
 
  • #10
Manchot said:
Well, my solid state textbook (Streetman's) defines the quasi-Fermi level for holes with the following statement:
[tex]E_i - F_p = k T \ln{\frac{p}{n_i}}[/tex]
So, for the difference to be negative, the number of holes would have to be less than the intrinsic number of holes. In an n-type semiconductor, this is definitely possible, so I would say that yes, the quasi-Fermi level for holes can be above the intrinsic level.

For example, consider steady-state optical generation. As the optical generation rate approaches zero, the semiconductor behaves more and more like it is at equilibrium. In that case, [itex]p[/itex] approaches [itex]p_0[/itex], the equilibrium value, and the above equation becomes equivalent to the relation for semiconductors at equilibrium. Hence, in this case, both the quasi-Fermi level for holes and electrons approach the equilibrium Fermi level, which for n-type material, is clearly above the intrinsic value.

Nice, thanks.
 
  • #11
I don't know why you care about separation of Fp and Ein. In reverse bias, gap between Fp and Fn increases by q*Vapplied (Fp is above Fn). In forward bias, it depends on how much voltage is applied. Usually you only look at the quasi-fermi levels (in steady state), Fp and Fn. Just draw an energy band diagram for forward and reverse bias and it should be clear.

edit: i guess if you want to calculate carrier density on p or n side you need to know Fn and Ein or Fp and Eip. But usually you should just use n*p = (ni)^2*exp((Fn-Fp)/kT). i should type this in latex... sorry about that. ni is intrinsic density level (ie. not doped)
 
Last edited:
  • #12
CrusaderSean said:
I don't know why you care about separation of Fp and Ein. In reverse bias, gap between Fp and Fn increases by q*Vapplied (Fp is above Fn). In forward bias, it depends on how much voltage is applied. Usually you only look at the quasi-fermi levels (in steady state), Fp and Fn. Just draw an energy band diagram for forward and reverse bias and it should be clear.

edit: i guess if you want to calculate carrier density on p or n side you need to know Fn and Ein or Fp and Eip. But usually you should just use n*p = (ni)^2*exp((Fn-Fp)/kT). i should type this in latex... sorry about that. ni is intrinsic density level (ie. not doped)

Why are you talking about a P-N Junction when he's asking about a doped n-type semiconductor ?
 
  • #13
abdo375 said:
Why are you talking about a P-N Junction when he's asking about a doped n-type semiconductor ?

whoops, didn't see it's just n-type. nevermind about what i said then, no wonder i thought it was an odd question. sorry about the confusion. in my electronics class, we only looked at quasi fermi levels for junctions. didn't realize this applies for single type semiconductor.
 

1. What is the Fermi level in n-type semiconductors?

The Fermi level in n-type semiconductors is the energy level at which there is a 50% probability of finding an electron. It is also known as the chemical potential of electrons.

2. How does the Fermi level change in n-type semiconductors?

In n-type semiconductors, the Fermi level moves towards the conduction band due to the presence of free electrons. This is because the Fermi level represents the energy at which electrons are most likely to be found, and in n-type semiconductors, the conduction band is the energy level where electrons are most likely to be found.

3. What is the relationship between the Fermi level and the band gap in n-type semiconductors?

The Fermi level is located at the top of the valence band in n-type semiconductors. The band gap is the energy difference between the valence band and conduction band. Therefore, the Fermi level is indirectly related to the band gap as it determines the energy level at which the conduction band begins.

4. How does doping affect the Fermi level in n-type semiconductors?

Doping, the process of intentionally introducing impurities into a semiconductor, can change the Fermi level in n-type semiconductors. When impurities such as phosphorus or arsenic are added, they donate extra electrons to the semiconductor material, causing the Fermi level to move closer to the conduction band.

5. Why is the Fermi level important in n-type semiconductors?

The Fermi level is important in n-type semiconductors because it determines the number of free electrons available for conduction. The closer the Fermi level is to the conduction band, the higher the number of free electrons and the better the material is at conducting electricity.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
852
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
430
Back
Top