Feynman diagram

  1. hob

    hob 6

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    What observation of the process: (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti muon neutrino) + (electron) constitutes unambiguous evidence for weak neutral currents,

    whereas the observation of (anti electron neutrino) + (electron) -> (anti electron neutrino) + (electron)

    3. The attempt at a solution


    The solution is the first one:

    {www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine1.jpg

    Since the second reaction can undergo via W+ as well as Z0:

    {www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine2.jpg


    My question is in the Feynman diagrams, why could you not have this for example:

    An electron decaying to a muon neutrino ?

    {www}.scribbleproductions.co.uk/stuff/fine3.jpg

    Apparently the weak interaction also violates charge conservation, but I have never seen a possible reaction with a Feynman diagram that is violated at the vertices's.

    Many thanks for any help :)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. nrqed

    nrqed 3,048
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The weak interaction does NOT violate charge conservation! So your third diagram is impossible. Charge is always conserved
     
  4. hob

    hob 6

    Thanks for that, I was a bit uneasy to see charge violation.

    Does weak violate anything to do with charge? I remember seeing something about charge violation that only the weak does not strong or e.m

    Regards,
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook
Similar discussions for: Feynman diagram
Loading...