1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

FFT Question with Notation

  1. Jan 23, 2012 #1
    http://carlodelmundo.com/fft.png [Broken]

    Quoted from a paper research paper: DUHAMEL,[/PLAIN] [Broken] P., AND VETTERLI, M. 1990. Fast fourier transforms: a
    tutorial review and a state of the art, Signal Processing 19, 4, 259–299


    Question on this statement,
    I don't quite understand why we "normalize" in this phase. What new insights can one ascertain from this normalization process? To me, the Math is legal, but the justification isn't quite elucidated. Perhaps it's just syntax, can someone explain why what the subscript in x0l really means (e.g.: how have we reached this conclusion and how does it help us)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: FFT Question with Notation
  1. Notation question (Replies: 3)

  2. Notation question (Replies: 2)

  3. Notation question. (Replies: 2)

  4. Question on notation (Replies: 5)

  5. Notation question (Replies: 4)

Loading...