Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Fhd expression bothering me for weeks

  1. Feb 3, 2008 #1
    Suppose the magnetization of some substance depends on the field H and temperature, i.e. M(H,T) and we have the mathematical identity

    [tex]\nabla \int _0 ^H M dH = M \nabla H + \int _0 ^H \nabla M dH[/tex]

    then it is derived in Ferrohydrodynamics (fhd) by Rosensweig that

    [tex]\nabla \int _0 ^H M dH = M \nabla H + \int _0 ^H \frac{\partial M}{\partial T} dH[/tex]

    but what happend with the dependence of M on H?! Shouldn't the above include a term

    [tex] \int _0 ^H \frac{\partial M}{\partial H} \nabla H dH[/tex]

    or is there some reason this should vanish? Can someone help me out of my misery?
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Fhd expression bothering me for weeks
Loading...