Fibonacci Proof: No Consecutive Numbers Divisible by Integers | Helpful Hints

  • Thread starter chocok
  • Start date
In summary, the Fibonacci Problem is a mathematical sequence discovered by Leonardo Pisano, also known as Fibonacci, in the early 13th century. It has many applications in mathematics and science, and has been observed in nature. The Fibonacci sequence is related to the Golden Ratio, a mathematical constant with aesthetic and mathematical properties. It has also been used in financial markets, although its effectiveness is debated.
  • #1
chocok
21
0
I got stuck on proving no two consecutive Fibonacci numbers are divisible by any integer greater than 1.

Some hint please? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If d divides A and B it divides A-B, that is sufficient for you to be able to prove this result.
 
  • #3


Sure, here are some helpful hints to guide you in your proof:

1. Start by assuming that there exists two consecutive Fibonacci numbers, F(n) and F(n+1), that are both divisible by some integer m > 1. This means that F(n) = km and F(n+1) = lm, where k and l are integers.

2. Use the definition of Fibonacci numbers, which states that F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2). Substituting in our assumed values for F(n) and F(n+1), we get km = F(n-1) + F(n-2) and lm = F(n-1) + F(n-2).

3. Subtract the two equations to eliminate F(n-1), leaving us with (k-l)m = F(n-2). This means that F(n-2) is also divisible by m.

4. Continue this process by substituting in the definition of Fibonacci numbers again, F(n-2) = F(n-3) + F(n-4), and repeating the same steps. Eventually, you will reach a point where F(2) and F(1) are both divisible by m, since the Fibonacci sequence starts with 1 and 1.

5. However, this is a contradiction because F(2) = 1 and F(1) = 1, which means that m must equal 1. But we initially assumed that m was greater than 1, so our assumption was incorrect.

6. Therefore, our initial assumption that there exists two consecutive Fibonacci numbers divisible by m > 1 is false, and we have proven that no two consecutive Fibonacci numbers are divisible by any integer greater than 1.

I hope these hints help you in your proof! Remember to clearly state your assumptions, use the definition of Fibonacci numbers, and follow the logic until you reach a contradiction. Good luck!
 

What is the Fibonacci Problem?

The Fibonacci Problem refers to a mathematical sequence in which each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, starting from 0 and 1. The sequence is as follows: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, etc. This problem is often used as a teaching tool for mathematical concepts such as recursion and pattern recognition.

Who discovered the Fibonacci sequence?

The Fibonacci sequence was first described by an Italian mathematician named Leonardo Pisano, also known as Fibonacci, in the early 13th century. However, the sequence was actually known to Indian mathematicians as early as the 6th century.

What is the significance of the Fibonacci sequence?

The Fibonacci sequence has many applications in mathematics and science, such as in the study of geometry, number theory, and coding theory. It also appears in nature, such as in the branching of trees, the arrangement of leaves on a stem, and the spiral patterns of shells and flowers.

How is the Fibonacci sequence related to the Golden Ratio?

The Golden Ratio, also known as the divine proportion, is a mathematical constant that has been studied since ancient times for its aesthetic and mathematical properties. The ratio between consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci sequence approaches the Golden Ratio as the sequence continues, making it a useful tool for studying the properties of this famous number.

What is the connection between the Fibonacci sequence and the stock market?

The Fibonacci sequence has been used in financial markets to predict potential support and resistance levels. Traders and analysts use Fibonacci retracements, which are based on the Fibonacci sequence, to identify levels where the market may potentially reverse or continue a trend. However, the effectiveness of this method is heavily debated and not universally accepted.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
712
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
997
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
796
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top