Field Notes About English Animal Mutilations: Linda Moulton Howe

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Twixtfanatic
2
0
The link you provide is for Earthfiles subscribers only. Inasmuch as this is currently (11 Nov. 2014) the only thread on Physics Forums pertaining to animal mutilations which has not yet been locked down, I hope it would not be inappropriate for me to comment about these phenomena in general.

If nothing else, this mystery, and the reaction or lack thereof by the scientific community at large, IMO says a lot about human nature. None of the explanations given seem particularly credible. Yet so many choose one and decide to go no further. I realize that a "woowoo" explanation is not appropriate here, and I concede there is virtually no direct evidence for such an explanation anyway. My intended point is, this is a real mystery. Isn't scientific discovery all about solving real mysteries? Why is Linda Moulton Howe nearly the only person who even appears to pursue this topic?
 
  • #3
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,854
4,809
The link you provide is for Earthfiles subscribers only. Inasmuch as this is currently (11 Nov. 2014) the only thread on Physics Forums pertaining to animal mutilations which has not yet been locked down, I hope it would not be inappropriate for me to comment about these phenomena in general.

If nothing else, this mystery, and the reaction or lack thereof by the scientific community at large, IMO says a lot about human nature. None of the explanations given seem particularly credible. Yet so many choose one and decide to go no further. I realize that a "woowoo" explanation is not appropriate here, and I concede there is virtually no direct evidence for such an explanation anyway. My intended point is, this is a real mystery. Isn't scientific discovery all about solving real mysteries? Why is Linda Moulton Howe nearly the only person who even appears to pursue this topic?
Please note that the original post is 11 years old, and it was made when PF was very young.
 
  • #4
dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,423
2,823
... it was made when PF was very young.
Showing your age Astro ... :D
 
  • #5
russ_watters
Mentor
21,937
8,973
Showing your age Astro ... :D
Since most kids start learning to read at age 6, the fact that Asto has been here for at least 11 years means, logically, that he must be at least 17.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #6
zoobyshoe
6,551
1,287
Since most kids start learning to read at age 6, the fact that Asto has been here for at least 11 years means, logically, that he must be at least 17.
Astro made no claim to remembering the post from when it was first posted. It is only necessary for him to be able to read to know the posting date. Therefore, his knowing the posting date says nothing about when he joined. As you say, he can read, so that says something, but he might have learned this precociously. He might actually be as young as 3.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #7
Bystander
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
5,405
1,493
The next step beyond necroposting is paleoposting?
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff

Suggested for: Field Notes About English Animal Mutilations: Linda Moulton Howe

Replies
18
Views
681
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
549
Replies
8
Views
515
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
803
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
811
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
308
Replies
8
Views
727
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
461
  • Last Post
64
Replies
2K
Views
43K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
596
Top