- #1

Loren Booda

- 3,119

- 4

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Loren Booda
- Start date

- #1

Loren Booda

- 3,119

- 4

- #2

selfAdjoint

Staff Emeritus

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 6,881

- 10

- #3

Loren Booda

- 3,119

- 4

Couldn't local Dirac singularities in my proposed field represent also

- #4

selfAdjoint

Staff Emeritus

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 6,881

- 10

Loren, go back and look at the integral I posted, notice that f(x) in there. It could be anything. What the Dirac δ does is to pick out a particular value of any function that you integrate. Dirac modeled it on the finite case of a vector like (0,1,0). If you inner multiply that by any arbitrary vector (a,b,c) you get

(a,b,c)(0,1,0) = 0*a + 1*b + 0*c = b

(so it picks out the second component, and if you used a 1 in a different place you would pick out a different component. Now in QM math the integral of the product of two "functions" is an inner product in the algebra of those functions, so δ(x-a) in the integral picks out the "a-value component" of the function.

(a,b,c)(0,1,0) = 0*a + 1*b + 0*c = b

(so it picks out the second component, and if you used a 1 in a different place you would pick out a different component. Now in QM math the integral of the product of two "functions" is an inner product in the algebra of those functions, so δ(x-a) in the integral picks out the "a-value component" of the function.

Last edited:

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 502

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 349

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 206

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 802

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 537

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 64

Insights
Yardsticks to Metric Tensor Fields

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 395

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 876

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K