If possible, could anyone criticize the following sequence of sentences ?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

1) Two n-dimensional affine subspaces are parallel iff they have the

same associated linear space.

2) Two different (non-equal) parallel affine subspaces are disjoint sets.

3) If two n-dimensional affine subspaces ( 'A' and 'B' ) are parallel to a third n-dimensional subspace then they are parallel to each other. (A || B )

4) Euclid's Fifth Postulate: Based on item 3), if two n-dimensional subspaces ( 'A' and 'B' ) parallel to a third n-dimensional subspace have a point in common, then they are equal (A = B).

5) Based on item 4), every affine space obeys the parallel postulate.

My question is : What item is wrong ?

thanx in advance

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fifith Postulate in Affine Spaces

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Fifith Postulate Affine | Date |
---|---|

I Example of computing geodesics with 2D polar coordinates | Aug 6, 2016 |

Non-affine Connections | Nov 5, 2014 |

Affine tangent plane | Jan 9, 2014 |

Is Euclid's Postulate 5 really a postulate of parallels ? | Feb 13, 2011 |

Postulates that Euclid neglected to mention? | May 1, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**