# Fill your car up with aluminum?

1. May 18, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

"Pellets made out of aluminum and gallium can produce pure hydrogen when water is poured on them, offering a possible alternative to gasoline-powered engines, U.S. scientists say."

continued... http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070518/us_nm/fuel_hydrogen_dc [Broken]

Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
2. May 18, 2007

### Chi Meson

How energy intensive is it to get alumininum from its ore? Can't be too much seeing how inexpensive aluminum is.
I should know this, but what is the comparison here? Is that a gallon of liquid hydrogen? Gaseous hydrogen at ATM? what is the available energy comparison? Why can't a scientist write these reports?

3. May 18, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

You're just supposed to "oooh and ahhhh", apparently they don't expect anyone to actually want facts.

4. May 18, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

How many kgs of Al/Ga are they talking about? I wonder how many moles of H2 per mile is consumed.

And where does one drop off the kgs of Al2O3 + Ga. And how often does one have to replace it.

I wonder if the $3.00/gal equiv includes replacing the spent Al/Ga. I wonder if they have figured out recycling of Al2O3 + Ga, and how much it will cost. Last edited: May 18, 2007 5. May 18, 2007 ### Ivan Seeking Staff Emeritus Am I going blind? Where did that come from? I take this to mean that it would be competitive with gas at$3.00 per gallon assuming the efficiency of fuel cells and electric motors. It does not automatically suggest that it can be made for $3.00 a gallon. Otherwise, since H2 can be burned directly in IC engines, it would be competitive with gasoline now. The big problem with this for now is that in order to buy a fuel cell having the output power of a typical engine, it would cost something like 100 times what you will pay for the gasoline needed to drive 100,000 miles - or about 100 times the price of an engine. Then, you still get to buy the hydrogen at$3.00 per gallon equivalent.

Hydrogen is an energy carrier and the water is a hydrogen carrier. This does nothing to solve the fundamental problem of an energy source - energy to mine and prococess the Al and Ga - but it does sound like a potentially good option for storage. There is another interesting option discussed here:

http://www.irn.org/programs/aluminum/index.php?id=archive/Foiling2005.html [Broken]

Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
6. May 18, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

Toward to bottom of the article cited by Evo -

7. May 18, 2007

### mrjeffy321

I saw this story earlier today and when I read it, it sounded so familiar…because I have been using a very similar method for about a year and half now. I can produce large quantities of Hydrogen gas in a very short amount of time. And using this same process, I was able to run a small internal combustion engine entirely fueled by Hydrogen gas.
It is very convenient to be sure, but I would not recommend it for full scale adoption as a fuel source of automobiles since refining the Aluminum ore takes such a huge quantity of energy and you end up wasting a lot of it in the Hydrogen extraction process.
It is much more efficient to just recycle the Aluminum and save the Aluminum plans from having to refine some ore, and then take that energy which would have been used and electrolysize water with it. But then you have to store and transport that electrolytically produce H2 instead of just making it on demand with Aluminum metal.

8. May 18, 2007

### Chi Meson

They changed it! Someone must have noticed that it made no sense. My quote from before was a direct cut-n-paste from the link. Maybe they were watching us?

9. May 18, 2007

### ShawnD

People keep throwing around numbers for fuel prices and they seem to forget taxes. More than half of what you pay at the pump is taxes, so it's really more like $1.50 per gallon for gasoline, then add taxes. If hydrogen was$3/gallon to make, it would be $4.50 per gallon to buy at the pump (or$6 if the government wants to be *******s).

10. May 18, 2007

### Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Ah, apparently they realized the error. The other statement suggested that the energy problem has been solved. And, clearly, due to the process losses, the energy to recycle the aluminum oxide back to Al would require more energy than is gained from the forward reaction.

But the issue of storage has always been an important one, so this could be significant.

Last edited: May 18, 2007
11. May 18, 2007

### Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
P.S., I had a whole bunch of late edits. I often post too soon...

12. May 18, 2007

### leright

Al2O3 is sapphire. Unfortunately it won't be crystallized sapphire when it comes out of the car. :tongue:

13. May 18, 2007

### ShawnD

How do you quickly exchange 350 pounds of waste with 350 pounds of new aluminum fuel pellets without completely redesigning the gas tank? Good question :tongue:

14. May 19, 2007

### Staff: Mentor

I am sure the performance degrades as the Al reacts with H2O, and I wonder about moisture in the engine when the weather is hot. Then there would be the corrosion issues. Or how about when the temperature overnight is well below 32°F (0°C) - :rofl:

15. May 19, 2007

### ShawnD

It might be able to keep itself warm if it constantly reacts. A few weeks ago I poured some Aluminum Chloride into the aqueous waste and it made the waste water pretty damn hot. It was also releasing huge clouds of HCl and one of my coworkers gave me the biggest "WTF" look I have ever seen :rofl:. Them aluminum compounds sure react crazy around water.
(it was in a fume hood, nobody was injured)