Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finally a Real Twin paradox!

  1. Apr 26, 2015 #1
    Landed on this PBS page, and read that there is going to be a real life twin paradox.

    Excerpt from the article "Astronaut twins Scott and Mark Kelly are about to realize this experiment: when Scott returns from a year in orbit in 2016 he will be about 28 microseconds younger than Mark, who is staying on Earth."

    Hopefully Scott's 28 millionths of a second age advantage doesn't spark a sibling rivalry. That's got to be a record age differential between twins.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 26, 2015 #2

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I believe the intrinsic age difference due to the time it takes a woman to give birth to the second twin significantly outweights this correction.
     
  4. Apr 26, 2015 #3

    Boo!!! Of course the basis for the fun in this is the assumption they were born at the same time....remarkable woman!!!

    Whats more here (if we're getting technical) is the development of Scott and Mark in the womb. If I understand right.....it's complicated enough to just say the were conceived at the same time.
     
  5. Apr 26, 2015 #4
    Identical twins are conceived as one child and then the egg splits in two.
     
  6. Apr 26, 2015 #5
    Well that wraps up the reasoning, the twins have zero age difference at conception...and in the most physically strict sense possible!!

    Girls have eggs?? I'm gunna go post some questions in the Biology Forum.
     
  7. Apr 26, 2015 #6

    Bandersnatch

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Don't bother. It's dominated by dogmatically-entrenched supporters of the stork theory.
     
  8. Apr 26, 2015 #7
    I suppose for completeness I should stress, as Orodruin mentioned, this is where the identities begin to deviate. Milliseconds of longevity gained in maturity is about as significant as one twin having a momentarily sticky keystroke while the other's is smooth.
     
  9. Apr 26, 2015 #8

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Given all the negative health effects of being in space, Scott probably has a lower life expectancy. By more than 28 microseconds.
     
  10. Apr 26, 2015 #9

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    Aack!!! That would be horrible. Poor woman.

    Should we ban all future discussions of the twin paradox on the grounds that an experimental resolution would be completely inhumane to the twin's mother?
     
  11. Apr 26, 2015 #10

    Ibix

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Now if only we knew the airspeed velocity of an unladen stork...
     
  12. Apr 26, 2015 #11

    Of course, and why i joked in that post "hoping" it wouldn't cause a sibling rivalry. Though I was thinking along the lines of experience, nobody fights over keystrokes....or do thea?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Finally a Real Twin paradox!
  1. The twin paradox (Replies: 1)

  2. Twin paradox and time (Replies: 4)

  3. Twin Paradox and age (Replies: 18)

Loading...