- #1
Antarres
- 170
- 81
Hello everyone,
I am currently working on finding a PhD in Europe. I have nothing against America or Canada, but due to some personal life choices I also have to make along with this PhD, I prefer to move into a country close to my own(Serbia), which means anywhere in Europe. I have recently finished master studies specializing in quantum field theory and gravitation, and I have no grade issues, I think(my GPA is 9.63/10 during bachelor's and 10/10 during master's). I was pretty much one of the top two or three students in my generation.
However, I have some trouble finding the mentor I would work with, which is the main goal for finding the PhD. My first point of view regarding the PhD was looking for universities which are ranked high on those lists of universities in physics, but I've come to a conclusion that being accepted to a high ranked institution isn't necessary the goal, since that rank may be based on quality of research in some area I am not interested in(e.g. nuclear physics or material science or idk). So I figured it would be the best to get in touch with some researchers who are working on something very interesting in the area of gravitation or quantum field theories, quantum gravity, quantum foundations, etc.
So then the next idea was to look up papers in those areas in search for interesting groups that work on that. But as you know, there are many different approaches to quantum gravity in particular, and most of those papers were not readable at my level(it was the end of bachelor's then), so I could not judge on the content of those pretty much. So I decided to work on my own foundations the best I could, getting advanced courses in QFT, GR etc, and reading material on that above the university level.
Regarding my background in quantum gravity, my best choice at an institute close to my faculty was to work in Poincare gauge theory. So that's what I did for master's thesis, and hopefully I will get some papers published out of that this autumn/winter. But this theory is kinda niche, and I don't seem to find too many people working on it in Europe. Also, I would not like to stick to one theory for a long period of time, since that would occupy a lot of my time solving different models which(as we know), might not be measurable or give any more fundamental answers than the ones I'd find by reading texts of the founders of the theory. Those models are generally functioning(from my experience) like proposing certain mathematical hypotheses, that could possibly(?) work out in the end, but without much motivation on the choice of the approach. I have no background in loop QG, string theory etc.(those are PhD level subjects at my university, and weren't the area of my thesis), but I would obviously like to get it. I would like to have a broader view of QFT/QG theories by the time I finish PhD so that I can have some sort of a trace which would guide my further carrier towards something interesting hopefully. Maybe this is optimistic, but I am not so ready to give up that point of view, I guess my experience so far doesn't allow me to do so.
So, maybe some people here have been or are in contact with interesting senior researchers that could be good PhD guides, or have information that would help me direct my sight on some particular groups. I kinda feel like that despite me having advanced knowledge for my age, it is immeasurable(a lot of people could have my grades or better out there) and therefore irrelevant to anyone who has been in the area for a much longer time than me. So they would probably look at my papers, but I don't know how relevant those would be since they are master's/phd level in not so popular theory, so therefore they could only indicate my ability to learn and perform research in some area, but they wouldn't be considered important papers(I guess that's reasonable too). Any advice regarding my situation will be gladly appreciated.
Regards!
Antarres
I am currently working on finding a PhD in Europe. I have nothing against America or Canada, but due to some personal life choices I also have to make along with this PhD, I prefer to move into a country close to my own(Serbia), which means anywhere in Europe. I have recently finished master studies specializing in quantum field theory and gravitation, and I have no grade issues, I think(my GPA is 9.63/10 during bachelor's and 10/10 during master's). I was pretty much one of the top two or three students in my generation.
However, I have some trouble finding the mentor I would work with, which is the main goal for finding the PhD. My first point of view regarding the PhD was looking for universities which are ranked high on those lists of universities in physics, but I've come to a conclusion that being accepted to a high ranked institution isn't necessary the goal, since that rank may be based on quality of research in some area I am not interested in(e.g. nuclear physics or material science or idk). So I figured it would be the best to get in touch with some researchers who are working on something very interesting in the area of gravitation or quantum field theories, quantum gravity, quantum foundations, etc.
So then the next idea was to look up papers in those areas in search for interesting groups that work on that. But as you know, there are many different approaches to quantum gravity in particular, and most of those papers were not readable at my level(it was the end of bachelor's then), so I could not judge on the content of those pretty much. So I decided to work on my own foundations the best I could, getting advanced courses in QFT, GR etc, and reading material on that above the university level.
Regarding my background in quantum gravity, my best choice at an institute close to my faculty was to work in Poincare gauge theory. So that's what I did for master's thesis, and hopefully I will get some papers published out of that this autumn/winter. But this theory is kinda niche, and I don't seem to find too many people working on it in Europe. Also, I would not like to stick to one theory for a long period of time, since that would occupy a lot of my time solving different models which(as we know), might not be measurable or give any more fundamental answers than the ones I'd find by reading texts of the founders of the theory. Those models are generally functioning(from my experience) like proposing certain mathematical hypotheses, that could possibly(?) work out in the end, but without much motivation on the choice of the approach. I have no background in loop QG, string theory etc.(those are PhD level subjects at my university, and weren't the area of my thesis), but I would obviously like to get it. I would like to have a broader view of QFT/QG theories by the time I finish PhD so that I can have some sort of a trace which would guide my further carrier towards something interesting hopefully. Maybe this is optimistic, but I am not so ready to give up that point of view, I guess my experience so far doesn't allow me to do so.
So, maybe some people here have been or are in contact with interesting senior researchers that could be good PhD guides, or have information that would help me direct my sight on some particular groups. I kinda feel like that despite me having advanced knowledge for my age, it is immeasurable(a lot of people could have my grades or better out there) and therefore irrelevant to anyone who has been in the area for a much longer time than me. So they would probably look at my papers, but I don't know how relevant those would be since they are master's/phd level in not so popular theory, so therefore they could only indicate my ability to learn and perform research in some area, but they wouldn't be considered important papers(I guess that's reasonable too). Any advice regarding my situation will be gladly appreciated.
Regards!
Antarres