1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding maximum value

  1. Mar 12, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Find the largest possible value of
    [tex]\sqrt{(x-20)(y-x)}+\sqrt{(140-y)(20-x)}+\sqrt{(x-y)(y-140)}[/tex]
    subject to ##-40≤x≤100## and ##-20≤y≤200##.

    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
    Factoring out ##\sqrt{(x-20)(y-x)(140-y)}## the given expression can be written as
    [tex]\sqrt{(x-20)(y-x)(140-y)}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{140-y}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-y}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-20}}\right)[/tex]
    From the above equation, ##x≠y##, ##x>20##, ##x>y## and ##y<140##.
    Hence, ##20≤x≤100## and ##-20≤y≤100##.
    But now I am stuck here. I have no clue about how should I proceed further. :(

    Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 12, 2013 #2
    hi

    I f we take cases for inequality between x and y ,none of them satisfy.
     
  4. Mar 12, 2013 #3
    Not sure what you mean, can you elaborate a bit more?
     
  5. Mar 12, 2013 #4
    Have you tried applying "Arithematic Mean ≥ Geometric mean" concept on each term? I can see a neat and clear approach from there.

    For example : The first term :

    √{(x−20)(y−x)} ≤ {(x-20)+(y-x)}/2
     
  6. Mar 12, 2013 #5
    How does that inequality help here? Applying that on the first term, I end up with
    [tex]\sqrt{(x-20)(y-x)} \leq \frac{y-20}{2}[/tex]

    How to proceed from here?
     
  7. Mar 12, 2013 #6
    Do you not notice that the maximum value of the first term is (y-20)/2 ? Keep on applying this for other two remaining terms and find their maximum value also.
     
  8. Mar 12, 2013 #7
    Okay, so you mean y=200?
     
  9. Mar 12, 2013 #8
    No hurry. Leave (y-20)/2 as it is for now. Find the maximum value for other terms using A.M.≥G.M. inequality in terms of x and y. What do you get ?
     
  10. Mar 12, 2013 #9
    For the second term it is ##\leq \frac{20-y-x}{2}## and for the third term it is ##\leq \frac{x-140}{2}##.
     
  11. Mar 12, 2013 #10
    For second term it should be (160-y-x)/2.. Now you know the maximum value for each term. Now add each term up. Obviously, adding each term will evaluate maximum possible value.
     
  12. Mar 12, 2013 #11
    Oops, yes, it is 160.

    Not sure but would you set x=100 and y=200 for the maximum value?
     
  13. Mar 12, 2013 #12
    That is not going to work. I am getting negative value for that. Check. Again, by using several values for y and x you get negative values. Either try plugging them in original expression or modified. Even worse, 140>y and y>140, both should be possible in original expression to avoid complex roots. How in the world do you think this will be possible?

    Take several ordered pairs of (x,y) and plug them in modified expression. You will get a negative values for majority.

    So instead simply add the maximum values you obtained for each term using inequality. You will see that x and y automatically cancel.
     
  14. Mar 12, 2013 #13
    :uhh:
    If I add the expressions for maximum values, it turns out to be zero. :(
     
  15. Mar 12, 2013 #14

    pcm

    User Avatar

    That is not going to work.What you say is maximum is true only for a=b,if you apply AM GM inequality on a,b.Doing so for 1st 2 expressions give x=140,y=260.

    *I don't know the answer*
     
  16. Mar 12, 2013 #15
    Edit: Ok, do not add it up. Probably plug (x,y) in modified expression to seek maximum magnitude of expression.

    I again post this wordings :

    Even worse, 140>y and y>140, both should be possible in original expression to avoid complex roots. How in the world do you think this will be possible?

    That is only possible when y=x. Also just analyze middle term in original expression.

    Analyzing the original expression further, to avoid complex roots :

    Case 1:

    x>20
    y>x => y>20

    y<140
    x<20

    x>y
    y>140

    Contradictions. You get complex roots here.

    Case 2:

    x<20 and y<x => y<20
    y>140 and x>20
    y>x and y<140

    Again contradictions..

    To avoid contradictions, I can see that y=x is the only way.

    @PCM:
    y=260 is out of domain.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2013
  17. Mar 12, 2013 #16

    pcm

    User Avatar

    (10,10)
     
  18. Mar 12, 2013 #17
    (-20,-20).. That is better. Sorry for messing this up and not analyzing the middle term carefully. :redface:

    That inequality was probably hazy thing to apply here. To avoid complex roots, x=y has to be possible.

    Also see my previous post.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2013
  19. Mar 12, 2013 #18

    pcm

    User Avatar

    yes,x=y is only possible.
    By graphing all lines and checking possible values for x,
    i get x between -20 and 20.
    And maximum is indeed for x=-20.
     
  20. Mar 12, 2013 #19
    If I use y=x, the original expression reduces ##\sqrt{(140-x)(20-x)}##, can I use Calculus to find its maximum value?
     
  21. Mar 13, 2013 #20
    I got it

    When we put x=y, and x=y=-20, we get the maximum value as 80.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Finding maximum value
  1. Fimd the maximum value (Replies: 6)

  2. Maximum value of a_n (Replies: 29)

  3. Finding maximum value (Replies: 9)

Loading...