Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding peak displacement from RMS sinusoidal acceleration without using frequency

  1. Feb 20, 2010 #1
    I am looking at sinusoidal motion (shaker tables) and am trying to calculate peak displacement given RMS acceleration.

    I can easily find the peak displacement using:

    [tex]a_{pk} = 4\pi^2f^2x_{pk}[/tex]

    [tex]a_{rms} = 0.707a_{pk}[/tex]


    [tex]x_{pk} = \frac{a_{rms}}{0.707\pi^2f^24} [/tex]

    My question is: isn't there a way to find the peak acceleration without using frequency and [tex]\pi[/tex] ?

    I am stuck thinking that there is since RMS voltage and current can be used to find power without the frequency being involved. I initially thought this would work:

    [tex]x_{pk} = \frac{1}{2}a_{rms}t^21.414 [/tex]

    [tex]t = \frac{1}{120} \ s[/tex] (quarter cycle for travel from 0 to peak)

    The values I've been using to work through this are: [tex]a_{pk} = 29.4 \frac{m}{s^2}, \ \ \ a_{rms} = 20.8 \frac{m}{s^2}, \ \ \ f = 30 Hz, \ \ \ x_{pk} = 0.825 mm [/tex]

    I even verified that RMS acceleration is the same for a quarter cycle as it is for a full cycle by doing this calculation:

    [tex]a_{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{\frac{3}{120} - \frac{1}{120}} \int^{\frac{3}{120}}_{\frac{1}{120}} sin(2\pi30t)^2 dt [/tex]

    but I calculated 0.707 from it.

    Any ideas what I'm missing?
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2010
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted