1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding roots to cubics

  1. Oct 16, 2005 #1

    how can i finding roots to cubics??

    explain by example

  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 16, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Perhaps you have an example in mind?
  4. Oct 16, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Oh how I just love these open-ended questions ;P
  5. Oct 16, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    If you want to find approximate vaues, use newton's method of approximation. (you can google for it).
    For a more analytical approach try here
  6. Oct 16, 2005 #5

  7. Oct 16, 2005 #6

    no i do not want newton's method of approximation :smile:

    i want (kardan) method but i am not sure about the spelling of (kardan)
  8. Oct 16, 2005 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Cardan's formula gives

    [tex]x = -\frac {\left( 179 - 9 \sqrt {345} \right)^{1/3}}{3}-\frac {\left( 179 + 9 \sqrt {345} \right)^{1/3}}{3} - \frac {5}{3}[/tex]

    for the real root. The other two are complex. And, no, I did not do it by hand! :)
  9. Oct 16, 2005 #8


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    If a and b are any two numbers then
    (a- b)3= a3-3a2b+ 3ab2- b3
    3ab(a-b)= 3a2b- 3ab2

    so (a-b)3+ 3ab(a-b)= a3- b3.

    In particular, if we let x= a-b, m= 3ab, and n= a3- b3, that says that x3+ mx= n. That is, we can pick any two numbers a, b and right down a cubic equation that has x= a- b as a root.
    The question is, can we go the other way: given m and n, can we find a and b so we can write x= a-b as a solution.
    The answer to that question is "Yes, we can"!

    Since m= 3ab, b= m/3a. Putting that int n= a3- b3, we have [tex]n= a^3- \frac{m^3}{3^3a^3}[/tex].
    Multiplying both sides of the equation by a3, we have
    [tex]na^3= a^6- (\frac{m}{3})^3[/tex]
    which looks worse but is just a quadratic equation in a3:
    [tex](a^3)^2- n(a^3)- (\frac{m}{3})^3[/tex].
    Use the quadratic formula to solve that
    [tex]a^3= \frac{n +/- \sqrt{n^2- 4\left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}}{2}[/tex]
    [tex]a^3= \frac{n}{2} +/- \sqrt{\left(\frac{n}{2}
    \right)^2- \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}[/tex]

    Since a3- b3= n, solving for b3 gives
    [tex]a^3= -\frac{n}{2} +/- \sqrt{\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)^2- \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}[/tex]

    Finding the cube root of each of those, then subtracting to get x= a- b gives the formula that Tide cited.

    Warning- applying that formula is really, really hard!
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 16, 2005
  10. Oct 16, 2005 #9
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Finding roots to cubics
  1. Roots of cubics (Replies: 2)

  2. Cubic Roots (Replies: 4)