• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Finding the electric field in Griffiths

  • Thread starter Reshma
  • Start date
743
4
This is referring to problem 2.25 in Griffiths. Find the potential at a distance 'z' above the midpoint between two equal charges, q, a distance 'd' apart. Compute the electric field in each case.
In the first part the charges are equal. The electric potential is:
[tex]V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{2q}{{\sqrt{z^2 + (d^2/4)}}}[/tex]
In this case, electric field given by [itex]\vec E = -\nabla V[/itex] is:
[tex]\vec E = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{2qz}{[{z^2 + (d^2/4)}]^{(3/2)}}} \hat z[/tex]
Matches with the result known in problem 2.2(a).

In the 2nd case we consider oppositely charges +q & -q. In this case the electric potential V = 0 which naively(:wink:) suggests [itex]\vec E = -\nabla V = 0[/itex] which is in contradiction to a previous known result in problem 2.2(b) which suggests:
[tex]\vec E = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{qd}{[{z^2 + (d^2/4)}]^{(3/2)}} \hat z[/tex]

How is this discrepancy accounted for?
 
138
4
I don't have the book with me right now. It would help if you posted the problem from 2.2 for comparison.
 

pervect

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,554
828
Reshma said:
In the 2nd case we consider oppositely charges +q & -q. In this case the electric potential V = 0 which naively(:wink:) suggests [itex]\vec E = -\nabla V = 0[/itex]
Why does V=0 even naively suggest that [itex]\nabla V[/itex], it's gradient is zero?
 
743
4
Jelfish said:
I don't have the book with me right now. It would help if you posted the problem from 2.2 for comparison.
Alright, here are both the questions:

Prob2.25: Find the electric potential at a distance 'z' above the midpoint between two charges +q and +q with 'd' being the distance between them. Also find the potential if the charges are -q and +q. Compute [itex]\vec E = -\nabla V[/itex] and compare your answer with prob.2.2. Explain carefully any discrepancy.

Prob2.2: Find the electric field at a distance 'z' above the midpoint between two charges +q and +q with 'd' being the distance between them. Repeat the problem with the charges as -q and +q.

This should be helpful to solve my problem.
 
138
4
For 2.25, calculate the potential using generalized coordinates first. That is,

[tex]V=kq \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x+\frac{d}{2})^2+y^2+z^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x-\frac{d}{2})^2+y^2+z^2}} \right) [/tex]

Switch to minus for the second part. Take the above expression's derivative and then plug in (0,0,z). The reason for this is that you lose the derivatives with respect to x and y if you plug in (0,0,z) before taking the derivative.

As a note, it may also help if you think about electric field lines. For two opposite charges next to each other, the field lines go from the positive to the negative, like in this picture:

http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/phys136d/modules/m4/images/dipole.gif [Broken]

Now, if you were to orient the two charges on the x-axis and your point were somewhere away from the midpoint on the z-axis, as you can see, the resultant field is not in the z direction. In fact, it's in the x-direction. Knowing this intuitively, you should expect the x-component to not go away. The only way to find it is to first use generalized coordinates.

I hope that helps some.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related Threads for: Finding the electric field in Griffiths

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
814
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
3K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top