Finding the Error Between Two Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter ACLerok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Points
AI Thread Summary
To define the error between two points with different coordinates, the distance formula is commonly used, calculated as the square root of the sum of the squared differences in their x and y coordinates. This distance can represent how far one point is from the other, indicating the level of error if one point is considered the true location. Additionally, when comparing overlapping boxes of different sizes, calculating the areas of both boxes can help determine the percentage of overlap, providing a clearer measure of how much the "wrong" box covers the "true" box. This approach combines geometric distance with area calculations to quantify error and overlap effectively. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applications in fields like data analysis and spatial modeling.
ACLerok
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
if given two points each with different x and y coordinates, what is the best way to define the error between these two points?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How do points have an "error"? About the only measurement I see is the distance between the points:
\sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2+ (y_1-y_2)^2}[/itex]
 
Like if one point is the true location and you want to say how much off the second point is. I guess the distance between them would be the best way to display this...
 
say there are two boxes that are not equal in size but close that are overlapping. is there an equation that can calculate how much the "wrong" box is covering the "true" box in percentage form?
 
Work out the areas.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top