Finding the total acceleration

  • Thread starter Lolagoeslala
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Acceleration
In summary, Gaetan Boucher started from rest and skated around a circular ice track of radius 100m at a constant rate of increase in speed. He finished one complete lap in 30 seconds. To calculate the magnitude of his total acceleration as he passed a point 1/4 of the distance around the track from the start, we used the formula a = v^2 / R and found the value to be approximately 0.042 m/s^2. This includes both tangential and radial acceleration components, which must be solved for separately.
  • #1
Lolagoeslala
217
0

Homework Statement


Gaetan Boucher started from rest and skated around a circular ice track of radius 100m. He maintained a constant rate of increase of his speed and finished one complete lap in 30s. Calculate the magnitude of his total acceleration as he passed a point 1/4 of the distance around the track from the start.

The Attempt at a Solution


v1 = 0m/s
r = 100m
d = 1/4d
a = ?
t = 30s

c = 1/4 x 2rπ
c = 157 m

t = 1/4 (30s)
t = 7.5s
157 m = (0m/s + v2)/2 (7.5s)
41.866 m/s = v2

157 m = 1/2a(t)2
5.58 m/s^2 = a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are two accelerations to be solved for here: tangential and radial.

First get tangential accel: this should be easy from the fact that this accel is constant.

Then you need to solve for speed v at the 1/4 point. You can do that by solving for the time it takes him to go to the 1/4 point (again using the tangential accel.) , then use your value of tangential accel one more time to get v. Finally, you compute the other component of accel (hint: it's called centripetal) to get the total accel.

The total accel is not the numerical sum of the two. The two accels are separate vectors, one pointing tangential to his course and the other towards the center of the ring. If you don't know vectors just leave the answer as two separate accelerations.
 
  • #3
rude man said:
There are two accelerations to be solved for here: tangential and radial.

First get tangential accel: this should be easy from the fact that this accel is constant.

Then you need to solve for speed v at the 1/4 point. You can do that by solving for the time it takes him to go to the 1/4 point (again using the tangential accel.) , then use your value of tangential accel one more time to get v. Finally, you compute the other component of accel (hint: it's called centripetal) to get the total accel.

The total accel is not the numerical sum of the two. The two accels are separate vectors, one pointing tangential to his course and the other towards the center of the ring. If you don't know vectors just leave the answer as two separate accelerations.

Okay i am a bit confused.
you said tangential acceleration,
a = (rw) / t

right?
i have not learned the tangential acceleration thoroughly so.
 
  • #4
Lolagoeslala said:
Okay i am a bit confused.
you said tangential acceleration,
a = (rw) / t

right?
i have not learned the tangential acceleration thoroughly so.
What is the angular acceleration ?
 
  • #5
SammyS said:
What is the angular acceleration ?

using this formula ω = θ / t

but i do not know the angle .. not wait i do.
1/4 x 360 = 90 deg

ω = θ / t
ω = n/2 / 7.5s
 
  • #6
Lolagoeslala said:
using this formula ω = θ / t

but i do not know the angle .. not wait i do.
1/4 x 360 = 90 deg

ω = θ / t
ω = n/2 / 7.5s
That's the average angular velocity for the first 1/4 of a lap.

The skater starts with ωi = 0, & averages π/(2(7.5)) rad/s ?

What is ωf at 1/4 lap ?

(Just as in the case of constant linear velocity, for constant angular velocity, ωAverage = (ωi + ωf)/2 .)
 
  • #7
SammyS said:
That's the average angular velocity for the first 1/4 of a lap.

The skater starts with ωi = 0, & averages π/(2(7.5)) rad/s ?

What is ωf at 1/4 lap ?

(Just as in the case of constant linear velocity, for constant angular velocity, ωAverage = (ωi + ωf)/2 .)

π/(2(7.5)) rad/s = (0 +ωf / 2)
π/7.5 rad/s = ωf
 
  • #8
Lolagoeslala said:
π/(2(7.5)) rad/s = (0 +ωf / 2)
π/7.5 rad/s = ωf
Yes.

From ωf & ωi , you should be able to find the angular acceleration, α .
 
  • #9
SammyS said:
Yes.

From ωf & ωi , you should be able to find the angular acceleration, α .

π/7.5 rad/s = at
π = a
 
  • #10
Lolagoeslala said:
π/7.5 rad/s = at
π = a
No. Bad algebra.

t = 7.5 s ,

so a = (π/7.5)/7.5 rad/s2

= ?
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
No. Bad algebra.

t = 7.5 s ,

so a = (π/7.5)/7.5 rad/s2

= ?

a= π/56.25 rad/s^2
 
  • #12
Lolagoeslala said:
a= π/56.25 rad/s^2

The tangential component of acceleration is [itex]\ \ a_t=\alpha R\ .[/itex]

The radial component of acceleration is simply the centripetal acceleration.
 
  • #13
SammyS said:
The tangential component of acceleration is [itex]\ \ a_t=\alpha R\ .[/itex]

The radial component of acceleration is simply the centripetal acceleration.
like this?

π/56.25 rad/s^2 x 100 m = a
5.58 radm/s^2 = a
 
  • #14
Lolagoeslala said:
like this?

π/56.25 rad/s^2 x 100 m = a
5.58 radm/s^2 = a
That's only the tangential component.
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
That's only the tangential component.

a = 5.58 radm/m^s2
v at the 1/4 point. You can do that by solving for the time it takes him to go to the 1/4 point
d = 200 m
C = 200 m x 3.14
C = 628 m
D = 1/4 628 m = 157 m

157 m = 1/2 (5.58 radm/m^s2)(t)^2
t = 7.5 s

157 m x 2 / 7.5 s =v2
41.866 m/s = v2

a = 41.866 m/s /100m
a = 0.041866 m/s^2
 
  • #16
Lolagoeslala said:
a = 5.58 radm/m^s2
v at the 1/4 point. You can do that by solving for the time it takes him to go to the 1/4 point
d = 200 m
C = 200 m x 3.14
C = 628 m
D = 1/4 628 m = 157 m

157 m = 1/2 (5.58 radm/m^s2)(t)^2
t = 7.5 s

157 m x 2 / 7.5 s =v2
41.866 m/s = v2

a = 41.866 m/s /100m
a = 0.041866 m/s^2
You went through some needless steps there.

You already have ω at t = 7.5s, which you already know is the time at the 1/4 lap mark.

v = ωR .

Centripetal acceleration is ac = v2/R .

(It's also equal to 2R)

I get a value different from yours.

By the way, rad∙m/s2 is merely m/s2 .
 
  • #17
SammyS said:
You went through some needless steps there.

You already have ω at t = 7.5s, which you already know is the time at the 1/4 lap mark.

v = ωR .

Centripetal acceleration is ac = v2/R .

(It's also equal to 2R)

I get a value different from yours.

By the way, rad∙m/s2 is merely m/s2 .

157 m x 2 / 7.5 s =v2
41.866 m/s = v2
a = v^2 / R
a = 41.866 m/s^2 / 100m
a = 17.52 m/s^2
 
  • #18
Lolagoeslala said:
157 m x 2 / 7.5 s =v2
41.866 m/s = v2

a = v^2 / R
a = 41.866 m/s^2 / 100m
a = 17.52 m/s^2
That's about right.

Tangential acceleration is in the direction of motion. Centripetal acceleration is towards the center of the circle. Therefore, they're perpendicular to each other.

Find the magnitude of the acceleration using your two results.
 
  • #19
a = 17.52 m/s^2[W] + 5.58 m/s^2
like this?
 
  • #20
Lolagoeslala said:
a = 17.52 m/s^2[W] + 5.58 m/s^2
like this?

No.

Acceleration is a vector quantity.

Tangential component is perpendicular to radial.
 
  • #21
SammyS said:
No.

Acceleration is a vector quantity.

Tangential component is perpendicular to radial.

i am bit confused i have not worked with tangential component before
 
  • #22
Lolagoeslala said:
i am bit confused i have not worked with tangential component before
In earlier posts this was mentioned, particularly in post #12.

Consider an object moving along some path. The velocity vector for the object will be along a line tangent to the path. The component of acceleration in the direction of the velocity vector is given by the time rate of change of the speed of the object: [itex]\displaystyle \frac{dv}{dt}\,,\ \ \text{ where }\ v=|\vec{v}|\ .[/itex]

At any rate, the tangential component is perpendicular to radial, so use the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude.
 
  • #23
c^2 = (17.52 m/s^2) ^2 + (5.58 m/s^2 )^2
c = 18.38 m/s^2
 
  • #24
Lolagoeslala said:
c^2 = (17.52 m/s^2) ^2 + (5.58 m/s^2 )^2
c = 18.38 m/s^2
That's correct to 3 sig. fig.
 
  • #25
SammyS said:
That's correct to 3 sig. fig.

so that's the answer
i do not need to worry about the orientation?
 
  • #26
but the answer does not match up with the answers possible.
 
  • #27
Lolagoeslala said:
but the answer does not match up with the answers possible.

What are the possible answers ?
 
  • #28
SammyS said:
What are the possible answers ?

1.4 , 2.99 , 4.39 , 4.60 , and 5.78
 
  • #29
Oh ! I see what went wrong.

It takes longer than 7.5 s for the first 1/4 of a lap.

Base the angular acceleration on one complete lap.

ωf = 2ωavg = 2(2π)/30 .

Angular acceleration, α = (ωf-0)/30 . That's 1/4 of the former answer.
 
  • #30
SammyS said:
Oh ! I see what went wrong.

It takes longer than 7.5 s for the first 1/4 of a lap.

Base the angular acceleration on one complete lap.

ωf = 2ωavg = 2(2π)/30 .

Angular acceleration, α = (ωf-0)/30 . That's 1/4 of the former answer.

i am abit confused
 
  • #31
Lolagoeslala said:
i am abit confused
Confused about what in particular ?
 
  • #32
SammyS said:
Confused about what in particular ?


ωf = 2ωavg = 2(2π)/30 .

Angular acceleration, α = (ωf-0)/30 . That's 1/4 of the former answer.
 
  • #33
Lolagoeslala said:
ωf = 2ωavg = 2(2π)/30 .

Angular acceleration, α = (ωf-0)/30 . That's 1/4 of the former answer.
What you didn't include from that post was:
Base the angular acceleration on one complete lap.
All I did in the above QUOTE'ed text was to repeat what we had previously done, but used a complete lap since for a complete lap, we know the elapsed time. Once you have this value, you will need to find the velocity at the 1/4 lap point so that you can recalculate the radial component of acceleration, since that is also wrong.

Do you know the kinematic equations for constant angular acceleration?




If you work everything out, you would find that using our previous answer for angular acceleration, π/7.5/7.5, one lap would take only 15 seconds.
 
  • #34
SammyS said:
What you didn't include from that post was:
Base the angular acceleration on one complete lap.
All I did in the above QUOTE'ed text was to repeat what we had previously done, but used a complete lap since for a complete lap, we know the elapsed time. Once you have this value, you will need to find the velocity at the 1/4 lap point so that you can recalculate the radial component of acceleration, since that is also wrong.

Do you know the kinematic equations for constant angular acceleration?




If you work everything out, you would find that using our previous answer for angular acceleration, π/7.5/7.5, one lap would take only 15 seconds.

i do not know how to find the
constant angular acceleration
 
  • #35
i am getting 4.60
 
<h2>1. What is total acceleration?</h2><p>Total acceleration refers to the combined effect of all the accelerations acting on an object. It takes into account both the magnitude and direction of the accelerations.</p><h2>2. How is total acceleration calculated?</h2><p>Total acceleration can be calculated using the formula a = √(ax² + ay² + az²), where ax, ay, and az are the individual accelerations in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.</p><h2>3. What is the difference between total acceleration and net acceleration?</h2><p>Total acceleration takes into account all the accelerations acting on an object, while net acceleration only considers the sum of the accelerations in a particular direction.</p><h2>4. Can total acceleration be negative?</h2><p>Yes, total acceleration can be negative if the combined effect of the accelerations results in a decrease in velocity or a change in direction in the opposite direction of the initial motion.</p><h2>5. How does total acceleration affect an object's motion?</h2><p>Total acceleration determines the rate at which an object's velocity changes. A higher total acceleration will result in a faster change in velocity, while a lower total acceleration will result in a slower change in velocity.</p>

1. What is total acceleration?

Total acceleration refers to the combined effect of all the accelerations acting on an object. It takes into account both the magnitude and direction of the accelerations.

2. How is total acceleration calculated?

Total acceleration can be calculated using the formula a = √(ax² + ay² + az²), where ax, ay, and az are the individual accelerations in the x, y, and z directions, respectively.

3. What is the difference between total acceleration and net acceleration?

Total acceleration takes into account all the accelerations acting on an object, while net acceleration only considers the sum of the accelerations in a particular direction.

4. Can total acceleration be negative?

Yes, total acceleration can be negative if the combined effect of the accelerations results in a decrease in velocity or a change in direction in the opposite direction of the initial motion.

5. How does total acceleration affect an object's motion?

Total acceleration determines the rate at which an object's velocity changes. A higher total acceleration will result in a faster change in velocity, while a lower total acceleration will result in a slower change in velocity.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
248
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
861
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
532
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
907
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
366
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
720
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
813
Back
Top