Hello all:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For modeling flow (or whatever) in a non-rectangular geometry, can anyone comment on whether the finite element method would be better or worse or the same as the integrated finite difference method?

I'm reading some papers by competing groups (so I can decide which code to start using), and the finite element group maintains that the flow field can be distorted when using the integrated finite difference method.

My questions: first of all, is this true? If so, is the problem significant? And are there any other potential advantages/disadvantages of either method over the other?

I have basic knowledge of these methods, but not enough to evaluate their advantages/disadvantages in a meaningful way! Thanks.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Finite element method versus intergrated finite difference for complex geometries?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Finite element method |
---|

A Runge Kutta finite difference of differential equations |

A Convergence order of central finite difference scheme |

A Finite Difference |

A Better way to find Finite Difference |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**