G is Finite and Closure Under Associative Product: Proving Group

In summary, if you have a finite set with associative and commutative operations, then it must be a group. The identity element and inverse will be present, and you can use the cancellation laws to conclude that anything multiplied by "a" in the group will also be in the group.
  • #1
asp
1
0
Given a finite set G is closed under an associative product and that both cancellation laws hold in G,Then G must be a group.

I need to prove that G must be a group, I understand that for this
I only need to show that :

1) There exist the identity
2) There exist the inverse.

But while trying to do this problem , i am not able to understand how to use the fact that G is finite ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hint: suppose X is a finite set, then any injective map from X to itself is a bijection (this is false for infinite sets).
 
  • #3
If you still can not figure it out, here is a more detailed hint:
the "product" you mentioned is but a fuction G*G -> G. For any a belonging to G, you can get a fuction G -> G f(x), which is a*x, and which is a one to one and onto(from the fact that it is one to one and and G is finite and the product follow the cancellation law), from which we can get that for any x belonging to G, there is a p such that f(p)=x.
Here we have draw that for any a belonging to G and any x belonging to G, there always a p, a*p=x (1)
similarly, we can get that for any a belonging to G and any x belong to G, there always a p, p*a=x (2)
from (1) and (2) and a theorem whick you must have learned, we conclude that G is a group.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
It may be easier to start like this. If you have:

a*b = a*c

Using the cancellation laws, what does that tell you? What can you conclude happens if you then multiply every element in your group by "a"?

And then, finally, what conclusions can you draw from this?
 

1. What is meant by "G is finite" in the context of proving a group?

When we say that "G is finite," we are referring to a group G that has a finite number of elements. In other words, the set of elements in G is limited and can be counted.

2. How does closure under associative product prove that a group is valid?

Closure under associative product means that when we combine any two elements in a group G using the group's defined operation, the result will always be another element in the group. This is a crucial property of a valid group because it ensures that the group's operation is well-defined and consistent.

3. What are the steps to prove that a group is valid using closure under associative product?

The steps to prove that a group is valid using closure under associative product are as follows:

1. Show that the group's operation is associative. This means that when we combine three elements in the group, the grouping of the first two elements does not affect the final result.

2. Show that the group's operation is closed. This means that when we combine any two elements in the group, the result is always another element in the group.

3. Show that the group's operation has an identity element. This means that there is an element in the group that, when combined with any other element, will give back that same element.

4. Show that each element in the group has an inverse. This means that for every element in the group, there is another element that, when combined, will result in the identity element.

4. Can a group be valid without closure under associative product?

No, closure under associative product is a necessary property for a group to be considered valid. If a group does not have closure under associative product, it means that the group's operation is not well-defined, and the group cannot function as a mathematical structure.

5. Why is proving the validity of a group important in mathematics?

Proving the validity of a group is important because it ensures that the group's operation is well-defined and consistent. This allows mathematicians to confidently use the group in their calculations and proofs, knowing that the results will be accurate and reliable.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
965
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
898
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top