# Finite potential well '
I've got these solutions to the Schrödinger equation ($-\frac{\hbar} {2m} \frac {d^2} {dx^2} \psi(x) + V(x)*\psi(x)=E*\psi(x)$):
x < -a: $\psi(x)=C_1*e^(k*x)$
-a < x < a: $\psi(x)=A*cos(q*x)+B*sin(q*x)$
x > a: $\psi(x)=C_2*e^(-k*x)$

$q^2=\frac {2m(E+V_0)} {\hbar^2}$ and $k^2=\frac {2mE} {\hbar^2}$

In a previous exercise i showed that in order for the wavefunction to be continuous the following has to be true:
For x = -a: $C_1*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)-B*sin(q*a)$
For x = a: $C_2*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)+B*sin(q*a)$
and for the derived wavefunctions:
x = -a: $k*C_1*e^-(k*a)=q*(A*sin(q*a)+B*cos(q*a))$
x = a: $-k*C_2*e^-(k*a)=-q*(A*sin(q*a)-B*cos(q*a))$

I also know that A*B=0. So here's the question:

I'm asked to show that when A = 0, the four equations above kan be reduced to $k=q*tan(q*a). But I'm not even sure where to start. Last edited: ## Answers and Replies Related Advanced Physics Homework Help News on Phys.org stevendaryl Staff Emeritus Science Advisor ' I've got these solutions to the Schrödinger equation ($-\frac{\hbar} {2m} \frac {d^2} {dx^2} \psi(x) + V(x)*\psi(x)=E*\psi(x)$): x < -a:$\psi(x)=C_1*e^(k*x)$-a < x < a:$\psi(x)=A*cos(q*x)+B*sin(q*x)$x > a:$\psi(x)=C_2*e^(-k*x)q^2=\frac {2m(E+V_0)} {\hbar^2}$and$k^2=\frac {2mE} {\hbar^2}$In a previous exercise i showed that in order for the wavefunction to be continuous the following has to be true: For x = -a:$C_1*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)-B*sin(q*a)$For x = a:$C_2*e^-(k*a)=A*cos(q*a)+B*sin(q*a)$and for the derived wavefunctions: x = -a:$k*C_1*e^-(k*a)=q*(A*sin(q*a)+B*cos(q*a))$x = a:$-k*C_2*e^-(k*a)=-q*(A*sin(q*a)-B*cos(q*a))$I also know that A*B=0. So here's the question: I'm asked to show that when A = 0, the four equations above kan be reduced to$k=q*tan(q*a). But I'm not even sure where to start.
Sure, you do. When $A=0$, your equations become:
1. $C_1 e^{-ka}= -B sin(qa)$
2. $C_2 e^{-ka}=-B sin(qa)$
3. $k C_1 e^{-ka}=q Bcos(qa))$
4. $-kC_2*e^{-ka}=q Bcos(qa))$
Using equation 1, you know $C_1e^{-ka} = -Bsin(qa)$
So replace $C_1 e^{-ka}$ by $-B sin(qa)$ in equation 3.

It doesn't look like it results in the same formula as you are expecting, so maybe there was a mistake somewhere.

• feynwomann
Oh it totally makes sense now. I forgot that my teacher said there was a mistake in the exercise. It's supposed to be B = 0. I didn't think of dividing the equations (I had actually done the first step, but didn't see how I could take it further). Anyway, thanks for the help!

Last edited: