I have a problem I can't quite figure out:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have a first order system [itex]S[/itex], and an interpretation [itex]I[/itex] of [itex]S[/itex]. I have to show that a closed well formed formula [itex]B[/itex] is true in [itex]I[/itex] if and only if there exists a valuation in [itex]I[/itex] which satisfies [itex]B[/itex].

I've done one of the two implications, but I still have problems with the part in which I have to show the existence of the valuation. I'm thinking that perhaps the wff being closed along with the property of the valuation which says that the valuation [itex]v[/itex] satisfies [itex](\forall x_i)\mathcal{B}[/itex] if every valuation [itex]v'[/itex] which is [itex]i[/itex]-equivalent to [itex]v[/itex] satisfies [itex]\mathcal{B}[/itex]. Is this idea way off? I can't seem to get started on the proof.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# First order logic

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**