Can some explain me why first order term in perturbation expansion of scattering matrix gives no contribution for every possible IN and OUT states? It is said that this is connected with the fact that condition of energy-momentum conservation cannot be satisfied for real photons and electrons. For me it isn't so obvious :((adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# First order term of S in QED

Loading...

Similar Threads - order term | Date |
---|---|

I Wavefunctions in first order degenerate pertubation theory | Jan 6, 2018 |

I How to compute second-order variation of an action? | May 9, 2017 |

I First order perturbation derivation | Mar 15, 2017 |

I Vacuum cutoff, normal ordering, Planck scale and 10^120... | Mar 6, 2017 |

Feynman Diagram term ordering | Dec 10, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**