So Reynold's transport theorem states that [itex]\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d t} \int_{V(t)} f \; \mathrm d V = \int_{V(t)} \partial_t f \; \mathrm d V + \int_{V(t)} \nabla \cdot \left( f \mathbf v \right) \; \mathrm d V[/itex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Now I would expect (on basis of conceptual reasoning) that if I were to apply this to an infinitesimal element around [itex]\mathbf r(t)[/itex], I should get the well-known (the so-called convective derivative) result [itex]\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d t} f(\mathbf r(t)) = \partial_t f + \left( \mathbf v \cdot \nabla \right) f[/itex]

However, it's straight-forward to see that one gets [itex]\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d t} f(\mathbf r(t)) = \partial_t f + \nabla \cdot \left( f \mathbf v \right)[/itex]

I get a term [itex]f \; \nabla \cdot \mathbf v[/itex] too much. What gives?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# [fluid dynamics] applying Reynold's transport theorem to an infinitesimal element (?)

Loading...

Similar Threads - fluid dynamics applying | Date |
---|---|

A Algebraic topology applied to Neuroscience | Aug 26, 2017 |

I Differentiation under the integral in retarded potentials | Jun 23, 2017 |

Conformal Transformation: Fluid flow over surface waves | Jun 11, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**