Fluids and Streamlines

  • #1
2,014
112
Hi PF!

I read that streamlines around a body change according to one's frame of reference. If we consider a sphere that is moving in a flow (low Re) would the streamlines change shape as we change our reference frame from being on the ball verses sitting aside and watching the ball move past us?

I think the two would look basically the same: the streamlines from the ball's frame of reference would look steady and wrap around the ball in an orderly fashion, where the streamlines from a sitting observer's perspective would appear to "move backwards" so as to constantly wrap around the ball.

Any ideas?

Edit: I just found these two images from a paper here: http://webspace.clarkson.edu/projects/crcd/me537/downloads/02_Pastsphere.pdf
The top images are in a moving frame of reference and the bottom two are in a stationary frame (I assume stationary implies as seen from the sphere). Can someone explain these? Perhaps @boneh3ad or @Chestermiller
moving.png
stationary.png
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
boneh3ad
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,299
977
The top pictures are the streamlines as viewed by a stationary observer. The bottom pictures are the streamlines as viewed by an observer moving with the ball. The top is basically the equivalent of subtracting the free-stream velocity from the bottom images. Basically, if you sit still and watch a ball pass, it will push a fluid particle away from its front, and then the particle will wrap back around the ball (or try to) due to the pressure gradient and end up fairly close to where it started (exactly where it started for potential flow).
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
  • #3
2,014
112
Basically, if you sit still and watch a ball pass, it will push a fluid particle away from its front, and then the particle will wrap back around the ball (or try to) due to the pressure gradient and end up fairly close to where it started (exactly where it started for potential flow).
So for the upper figures are you suggesting that the curved streamlines are actually parts of a circle that will reconnect? This is evident for the upper right, but the upper left doesn't seem like it would ever attach to itself.
 
  • #4
boneh3ad
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,299
977
So for the upper figures are you suggesting that the curved streamlines are actually parts of a circle that will reconnect? This is evident for the upper right, but the upper left doesn't seem like it would ever attach to itself.

Well those pictures are clearly not computed streamlines. They are hand-drawn for illustrative purposes. In a viscous flow, the ball would drag some of the fluid with it, so a fluid particle would likely still loop around, but it would end at a different location upstream of where it started (upstream as in further along the ball's movement path, which is upstream in the case of the stationary ball frame).
 
  • #6
dimasmr21
Hi, i want to know if there is any reference regarding the derivation of this velocity potential.
By which i mean the problem of "flow around a moving cylinder". I want to derive the velocity potential of the fluid around a moving cylinder.

Thank you !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
14,584
3,813
Hi, i want to know if there is any reference regarding the derivation of this velocity potential.
By which i mean the problem of "flow around a moving cylinder". I want to derive the velocity potential of the fluid around a moving cylinder.

Thank you !
Post a new thread.
 
  • #8
dimasmr21
Post a new thread.
sorry, i will start a new thread.
 

Related Threads on Fluids and Streamlines

  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
520
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
455
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
649
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
601
Top