1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Flux through two parametrized surfaces

  1. May 17, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Show that the flux through a parametrized surface does not depend on the choice of parametrization. Suppose that the surface [tex]\sigma[/tex] has two parametrizations, r(s,t) for (s,t) in the region R of st-space, and also r(u,v) for (u,v) in the region T of uv-space, and suppose that the two parametrizations are related by a change of variables: u = u(s,t), v = v(s,t). Suppose that the Jacobian determinant [tex]\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(s,t)}[/tex] is positive at every point (s,t) in R Use the change of variables formula for double integrals to show that computing the flux integral [tex]\Phi=\int\int Fnds [/tex] parametrization gives the same result.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    So if the Jacobian determinant is positive at every point in R, what does that mean for T? That it is positive as well?
    Have I used to the change of variables formula to show that computing the flux using either parametrization gives the same result?

    Thanks for your help.

    Last edited: May 17, 2010
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads - Flux through parametrized Date
Flux Through a Cylinder Dec 11, 2017
Calculating Flux through Ellipsoid Mar 28, 2015
Outward Flux Through Cylinder Feb 28, 2015
Flux through a section of a sphere Apr 15, 2014
Quick question - Flux through a sphere Feb 13, 2014