1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Follow up on Velocity 4-Vectors

  1. Dec 10, 2016 #1
    I did not use the template for this posting.

    My understanding for the relativistic transformation of a velocity u to u' is given by

    $$
    \begin{bmatrix}
    \gamma_{u'} \\
    \gamma_{u'} u'_x \\
    \gamma_{u'} u'_y \\
    \gamma_{u'} u'_z
    \end{bmatrix}
    =
    \begin{bmatrix}

    \gamma & -\gamma\beta_x & -\gamma\beta_y & -\gamma\beta_z \\
    -\gamma\beta_x & 1+\frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x^2}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x\beta_y}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x \beta_z}{\beta^2} \\

    -\gamma\beta_y & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x\beta_y}{\beta^2} & 1+\frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_y^2}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_y\beta_z}{\beta^2} \\

    -\gamma\beta_z & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x\beta_z}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_y\beta_z}{\beta^2} & 1+\frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_z^2}{\beta^2}

    \end{bmatrix}
    \begin{bmatrix}
    \gamma_{u} \\
    \gamma_{u} u_x \\
    \gamma_{u} u_y \\
    \gamma_{u} u_z
    \end{bmatrix}
    $$
    Where v is the velocity of reference frame S' with respect to reference frame S and
    $$
    \beta_x = v_x/c \\
    \beta_y = v_y/c \\
    \beta_y = v_y/c \\
    \beta^2 = \beta_x^2 + \beta_y^2 + \beta_z^2 \\
    \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} \\
    \gamma_u = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta_u^2}} \\
    \gamma_{u'} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta_{u'}^2}}
    $$
    This seems to work for any object whose velocity is less that c. But, I got the impression from a previous post that I could transform the velocity of light rays the same way I transformed the velocity of massive objects.

    If I try to do that using the definitions I have above it means calculating $$\gamma_u$$ for a light ray. That's undefined. I have a 3-vector version of the velocity addition formula that doesn't require such a calculation and it works fine. Did I get the 4-vector structure wrong?
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Follow up on Velocity 4-Vectors
  1. Velocity 4-vector (Replies: 4)

Loading...