While working on a problem in special relativity I ran into the following equation and am trying to understand it before going on. It was accompanied by the vague statement that at relativisitic speeds, force & acceleration aren't necessarily in the same direction.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \vec{F} = m_{o}\gamma \vec{a} + m_{o} \vec{u} \gamma^{3}(\vec{a} \cdot \vec{u}) / c^{2}[/tex]

where

[tex] \gamma \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - u^2/c^2}}

[/tex]

To understand this, I apply it to the case where

[tex] \vec{F} = eE_{o} \hat{y}[/tex] and [tex]u(t=0) = u_{o} \hat{x}[/tex] and [tex]u_{x}(t=0)[/tex] is nearly equal to c.

Now, looking at the x and y components, since the left side has only y component, so must the right side. Therefore the coefficients of [tex] \hat{x} [/tex] must be zero which gives me the following equation:

[tex] a_{x} + \gamma^{2}u_{x}a_{x}/c^{2} + \gamma^{2}u_{y}a_{y}/c^{2} = 0 [/tex] with solution [tex]a_{x} = -\gamma^{2}u_{y}a_{y}/c^{2}* \frac {1}

{ (1+\gamma^{2}u_{x}/c^{2})}

[/tex]

question:Is this the right approach? am I right that the x component must vanish? Notice that for the relativistic case, even though the x component F is zero, there is still an x component to the acceleration.

I like the sign of ax because it should be negative (the x component of u must decrease as the y component increases since the speed must be less than c) and as c goes to infinity (classical case), ax goes to zero. To do this, there must be a negative x component of the acceleration.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Force & acceleration equation

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**