1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Force magnetized fluid

  1. Jan 27, 2008 #1
    The force on a single dipole (dipole moment m) can be obtained by taking the gradient of its energy, i.e.

    [tex]\vec{F} = \nabla (\vec{m} \cdot \vec{B})[/tex]

    One also often encounters for the energy of a magnetized material

    [tex]-\mu_0 \vec{M}\cdot \vec{H}[/tex]

    And often the force on a material with magnetization M is written

    [tex] \vec{F}=\mu_0 M \nabla H[/tex]

    why the replacement of B with H? Does it have something to do with the fact that part of B is producedby the magnetization (B=mu_0(H+M)) and the material can't excert a force on itself?? Or does one necessarily have to dive into the derivations to get an idea why?

    Any intuitive thoughts?
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 27, 2008 #2


    User Avatar

    Do you have a source for your equations with H?
    Probably the muzero H just stands for B outside the magnet.
  4. Jan 27, 2008 #3
    The force equation with H (M gradH) (Kelvin force) is the standard expression used in ferrohydrodynamics (see e.g. Rosensweig) when dealing with dilute colloids for example.

    I'm wondering if the use of H instead of B results from the fact that only the external applied magnetic field should be used in evalueating the force because the magnetized material cannot exert a force on itself. Any familiarity with these expressions?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook