Forget the chicken and it's egg

  • Thread starter sameandnot
  • Start date
  • #1
295
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

what came first? organisms or consciousness?

this argument is a little different than the "chicken or the egg" bit...
we get around the "chicken or the egg" by recognizing evolution.

but, let's go back a little farther...

is consciousness a characterisitc of organisms? or are organisms a characteristics of consciousness?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
sameandnot said:
what came first? organisms or consciousness?
this argument is a little different than the "chicken or the egg" bit...
we get around the "chicken or the egg" by recognizing evolution.
but, let's go back a little farther...
is consciousness a characterisitc of organisms? or are organisms a characteristics of consciousness?
Attributing consciousness to lower organisms (let's define premammal to be lower) tends to rob the word of its usual meaning. If a bee is conscious then so, in my opinion, is a thermostat.
 
  • #3
Rade
sameandnot said:
what came first? organisms or consciousness?
Neither, Existence came first. A non-existent organism or consciousness as a first cause-effect is a condradiction of terms. Before a thing can be a prime cause, it first must exist. The Primacy of Existence is an axiom upon which all further thinking (philosophy) must be developed.
 
  • #4
Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,974
39
Interesting question. Is there anything to suggest they didn't evolve equally along parallel paths? In other words, organisms evolved and thus the increase in consciousness was equal to the increase in complexity of the organism.
 
  • #5
192
1
Q_Goest said:
Interesting question. Is there anything to suggest they didn't evolve equally along parallel paths? In other words, organisms evolved and thus the increase in consciousness was equal to the increase in complexity of the organism.
Consciousness evolves much as life itself; in stages of complexity. If we describe consciousness as awareness then this implies sensory organs and perception, (something to be aware of and something to be aware with), therefore such organisms must evolve before consciousness can take place.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,605
2,065
I'm a bit confused by the apparent simplicity of the question.

Does anyone believe that worms or plants or fungi or diatoms or bacteria are conscious?

How can anyone seriously wonder if consciousness came before organisms?
 
  • #7
192
1
DaveC426913 said:
I'm a bit confused by the apparent simplicity of the question.
Does anyone believe that worms or plants or fungi or diatoms or bacteria are conscious?
How can anyone seriously wonder if consciousness came before organisms?
I believe this must result from a failure to recognize the meaning and nature of consciousness, possibly from a desire to escape the responsibility that arises from a consciousness which is accompanied by reason and choice.
 
  • #8
295
0
anthropomorphists.

what is consciousness, if not the response, of an entity, to its environment, founded in the awareness of said environment, by said entity?

-responsive awareness...

Q_Goest, you are the closest, and most probably correct. we see it most clearly.

consciousness does not mean individual self-consciousness. if i am conscious, then my cat is conscious, and a bee is conscious, in similar fashion. it is, perhaps, impossible to say, which came first, as they are, perhaps, mutually arising.

get out (over) yourselves, ego-centric humans.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
62
0
DaveC426913 said:
I'm a bit confused by the apparent simplicity of the question.
Does anyone believe that worms or plants or fungi or diatoms or bacteria are conscious?
How can anyone seriously wonder if consciousness came before organisms?
People have a hard time imagining non-existence. This in itself is amusing to me
 
  • #10
857
2
sameandnot said:
anthropomorphists.
what is consciousness, if not the response, of an entity, to its environment, founded in the awareness of said environment, by said organism?
-responsive awareness...
Q_Goest, you are the closest, and most probably correct. we see it most clearly.
I agree, but according to this statement, is all life conscious(as having responsive awareness)?

Personally i think the radio analogy is a good one: that consciousness is not produced by the brain, but received by it. Just like a radio receives radiowaves. So I think consciousness came first.
 
  • #11
295
0
good point, pit2.

what's our defintion of "organism"? we must find the essence of what it means to be defined an organism.
 
  • #12
hypnagogue
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,244
2
sameandnot said:
get out (over) yourselves, ego-centric humans.
An attitude like this will certainly not be conducive to productive discussion.
 

Related Threads for: Forget the chicken and it's egg

  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top