How do we deal with the poles in QCD form factors?

In summary, form factors in QCD are described as f(q²)=f(0)/(1-q²/m²), with a pole at q=m. To plot these form factors against center of mass energy and deal with the pole, a small negative imaginary part is assigned to the mass. However, this may not be the most accurate representation for non-perturbative QCD. The form factors can also be extended to the complex q² plane, with poles excluded on the first sheet, and it is expected that for timelike q² there is a complex cut structure. The dipole form factor, which is commonly used, is not realistic for negative values of Q² and the value of μ² = 0.71
  • #1
plasmon
36
1
Form factors in QCD are given in following form "f(q^2)=f(0)/(1-q^2/m^2)". This expression has a pole at q=m. How do we plot these form factors vs center of mass energy and deal with the pole.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I hope mass is still given a small negative imaginary part to deal with like qed propagators.May be it is not right with form factors.
 
  • #3
The electric (magnetic) form factor are measured via electron scattering i.e. via one-photon exchange between the electron and the charge (current) density of the hadron. Usually form factors are introduced as Fourier transform of the charge (current) density; but this picture is rather misleading when applied to non-perturbative QCD.

For Q² = -q² > 0, qμ is the 4-momentum transfer, the form factors do not have poles for spacelike, physical values of Q². The above mentioned equation should read

[tex]G(Q^2) \sim \frac{1}{1+Q^2/\mu^2}[/tex]

The world data fit for μ² is 0.71 GeV/c². This is the standard dipole form factor; in reality the hadron form factors deviate from this simple form.

The definition of the form factors can be analytically continued to the complex q² plane. Here poles are excluded on the first q² sheet in the complex plane. It is expected that for timelike q² there is a complicated cut structure of a Riemann manifold in q² with multiple sheets. The first cut opens at q² = (2mπ)² which is the threshold for pion pair production.

Therefore the above mentioned dipole form factor is not realistic for Q² < 0. μ² = 0.71 GeV/c² is not related to a physical pole.

Remark: the form factors are expected to satisfy a dispersion relation like

[tex]G(q^2) = \frac{1}{\pi}\int^\infty_{(2m_\pi)^2}ds \frac{\text{Im}\,G(s)}{s-q^2}[/tex]
 

1. What is a form factor in QCD pole?

A form factor in QCD pole refers to a mathematical quantity that describes the interaction between two particles in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which is the theory of the strong nuclear force. It is used to calculate the probability of a quark inside a hadron (such as a proton or neutron) to emit or absorb a virtual photon.

2. How are form factors calculated in QCD pole?

Form factors in QCD pole are calculated using a combination of experimental data and theoretical calculations. The experimental data comes from high-energy experiments that measure the interaction between particles, while the theoretical calculations use equations from QCD to describe the underlying physics.

3. What is the significance of form factors in QCD pole?

Form factors in QCD pole play a crucial role in understanding the structure of hadrons and the strong force that holds them together. They also provide valuable information about the properties of quarks, such as their charge distribution and spin.

4. How do form factors in QCD pole relate to other form factors?

Form factors in QCD pole are closely related to form factors in other quantum field theories, such as quantum electrodynamics (QED) and weak interactions. They all describe the interaction between particles through the exchange of virtual particles, but the specific form of the equations differs depending on the type of force being studied.

5. Can form factors in QCD pole be experimentally measured?

Yes, form factors in QCD pole can be experimentally measured through high-energy scattering experiments, where the interactions between particles are studied and compared to theoretical predictions. These measurements provide valuable insights into the strong nuclear force and the structure of hadrons.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
830
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top