1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Formula relationship

  1. Mar 13, 2005 #1

    tony873004

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Show that
    [tex]4\pi^{2}/G = 1yr^{2} M_{Sun}/AU^{3} [/tex]
    and that therefore Kepler's 3rd Law reduces to
    [tex]P^{2}=a^{3}/(m_{1}+m_{2})[/tex]
    if the period P is expressed in years, the semimajor axis a is expressed in AU, and the sum of the masses is expressed in solar masses.

    [tex]G = 6.672*10^{-11}Nm^{2}/kg^{2}[/tex]
    [tex]N = kg m/s^{2}[/tex]
    [tex]1 year = 3.15581*10^{7}seconds[/tex]
    [tex]1 AU = 1.49598*10^{11}meters[/tex]
    [tex]1 Solar mass = 1.9891*10^{30}kg[/tex]


    [tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}}{6.672*10^{-11} \frac{N m^{2}}{kg^{2}}}=\frac {3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg}{1.49598*10^{11}m^{3}}[/tex]


    Substitute [tex]kg m/s^{2} for N[/tex]

    [tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}}{6.672*10^{-11} \frac{kg\frac{m}{s^{2}} m^{2}}{kg^{2}}}=\frac {3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg}{1.49598*10^{11}m^{3}}[/tex]

    in the left side of the equation, cancel kg's and combine m's

    [tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}}{6.672*10^{-11} \frac{\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}}{kg}}=\frac {3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg}{1.49598*10^{11}m^{3}}[/tex]

    re-write the equation

    [tex]{4\pi^{2} * 1.49598*10^{11}m^{3} = 6.672*10^{-11} \frac{\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}}{kg} * 3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg [/tex]

    The m^3 on the right cancels with the m^3 on the left
    the s^2's in the left side of the equation cancel with each other since one is in the denomanator of a fraction, and the other one isn't.
    The kg's in the left side of the equation cancel with each other since one is in the denomanator of a fraction, and the other one isn't.

    [tex]{4\pi^{2} * 1.49598*10^{11} = 6.672*10^{-11} * 3.15581*10^{7}*1.9891*10^{30} [/tex]

    and when I compute this I get:

    [tex]591702901743.965 = 4.1881622988912*10^{27}[/tex]
    and that's just not right!! Where did I go wrong?
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 13, 2005 #2
    [tex] 1 \mbox{year} = 3.15581 \cdot 10^7 \mbox{s} \Longrightarrow (1 \mbox{year})^2 = (3.15581 \cdot 10^7 \mbox{s})^2 \neq 3.15581 \cdot 10^7 \mbox{s}^2[/tex]

    similarly for [tex]\mbox{AU}^3[/tex].
     
  4. Mar 13, 2005 #3

    tony873004

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    :smile: Thanks, Data. That's the 2nd time you've bailed me out in the last 2 days.

    I also made a small error in G. Should be [tex]6.673*10^{-11}[/tex], not [tex]6.672*10^{-11}[/tex]

    So this should change my final line before computing the numbers to:

    [tex]{4\pi^{2} * 1.49598*10^{33} = 6.673*10^{-11} * 3.15581*10^{14}*1.9891*10^{30} [/tex]

    which gives me
    [tex]5.90589231677665*10^{34} = 4.1887900210583*10^{34}[/tex]

    They're not too different. At least they're in the same magnitude instead of being 16 magnitudes apart. I'm wondering if this is as good as it gets or if I made another error somewhere?

    Any idea how to do the 2nd part of this question, how does this cause Kepler's 3rd law to reduce to [tex]P^{2}=a^{3}/(m_{1}+m_{2})[/tex] ?
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2005
  5. Mar 13, 2005 #4
    Almost. You forgot to square the 3.15581, and cube the 1.49598!

    The second question is a really ambiguous one. In order to get it to that form, you must assume that both sides of the equation are unitless (otherwise, you keep the fraction [tex]\frac{\mbox{yr}^2}{\mbox{AU}^3}[/tex] on the right side of the equality to balance units). This in turn means you just assume the result for P is in years, etc., which is silly. Anyways, Kepler's Third Law is

    [tex]P^2 = \frac{a^3}{m_1+m_2}\cdot \frac{4\pi^2}{G}[/tex]

    Just substitute in the equality that you proved in the first part, and see how far you can get~
     
  6. Mar 13, 2005 #5

    tony873004

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Thanks, Data. I squared and cubed those numbers, and now the answers are equal. I got the second part too. I had to make a new value for G, which equaled 4pi^2, they cancelled out and I was left the equation I was asked to justify.
     
  7. Mar 14, 2005 #6
    You set [tex]G = 4 \pi^2[/tex]? With what justification?
     
  8. Mar 14, 2005 #7

    tony873004

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    [tex]G=6.673*10^{-11}N m^{2}/kg^{2}[/tex] , therefore
    [tex]G=6.673*10^{-11}kg (m/s^{2}) m^{2}/kg^{2}[/tex]

    substitute in the conversions from mks to AU, Solar Masses, Years

    0.00000000006673 * ((1 / 1.9891E+30) * (1 / 149598000000#) / (1 / 31558100) ^ 2#) * (1 / 149598000000# ^ 2 / (1 / 1.9891E+30) ^ 2)

    and magically the whole thing equals exactly 4pi^2
    Sorry, I didn't feel like TEXing it.

    By converting all the units in G to AU, Years, and Solar Masses. Now G cancels out with 4pi^2
    [tex]P^2 = \frac{a^3}{m_1+m_2}\cdot \frac{4\pi^2}{G}[/tex]

    reduces to

    [tex]P^{2}=a^{3}/(m_{1}+m_{2})[/tex]

    Which is what the question asked me to do.
     
  9. Mar 14, 2005 #8
    Ok, that's fine. Make sure you leave in the unit conversion term, though (ie. the magnitude equals the magnitude of [tex]4\pi^2[/tex], but there are still units hanging around that [tex]4\pi^2[/tex] does not carry). You really can't simplify it to the form in your question, as there's always a unitary conversion factor lying around. But whatever, I guess they want you to write it that way :)
     
  10. Mar 14, 2005 #9

    tony873004

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yeah, those units bugged me too. So I just dropped them all together 2 steps before my final answer. When the teacher talked about this one in class, everyone had a blank stare. But she hinted that this was the way to do it. At least I'll get effort points!!

    Thanks for all your help, Data!
     
  11. Mar 14, 2005 #10

    tony873004

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I asked in class today. The units do carry down to the 1.0 computed with 4pi^2/G. Then when you replace the 4pi^2/G in the Kepler's law with 1.0&units, the units cancel with the units in the rest of Kepler's law so that P^2 comes out in years.
     
  12. Mar 14, 2005 #11
    I agree, but then the [tex]P, \ a, \ m_1, \ m_2[/tex] in your new equation aren't the same ones in the original equation (the new ones are unitless). Essentially the point is that [tex] \mbox{time} \neq \frac{\mbox{distance}}{\mbox{mass}}[/tex].
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Formula relationship
  1. The Formula (Replies: 3)

  2. Wrong relationship? (Replies: 1)

Loading...