- #1
- 2
- 0
Dear Ladys and Gentlemans,
I want to measure the sheet resistance R_square on a printed product.
My measuring equipment consists a SMU to supply and measure and a four point Probe by Jandel.
As output size I get the electrical resistance R (basically the measured Voltage U divided by the supply current I)
So I have to multiply the geometric factor and a correction factor (correction factor because the width is small)
The derivation for the geometric factor I have found on :
http://www.four-point-probes.com/four-point-probe-...
And the correction factor table is shown here, in my case its on page 54
https://www.iiserkol.ac.in/~ph324/StudyMaterials/G...
Funny but true, I get twice the value than in the reference measurement system (eddy current technology)
So may we can discuss why?
And the bigger Question: why is the resistance calculated in the derivation with U/2I.
In my opinion there is no superposition of currents because they have a different sign.
Thank you in advance,
ScieneShines
I want to measure the sheet resistance R_square on a printed product.
My measuring equipment consists a SMU to supply and measure and a four point Probe by Jandel.
As output size I get the electrical resistance R (basically the measured Voltage U divided by the supply current I)
So I have to multiply the geometric factor and a correction factor (correction factor because the width is small)
The derivation for the geometric factor I have found on :
http://www.four-point-probes.com/four-point-probe-...
And the correction factor table is shown here, in my case its on page 54
https://www.iiserkol.ac.in/~ph324/StudyMaterials/G...
Funny but true, I get twice the value than in the reference measurement system (eddy current technology)
So may we can discuss why?
And the bigger Question: why is the resistance calculated in the derivation with U/2I.
In my opinion there is no superposition of currents because they have a different sign.
Thank you in advance,
ScieneShines