- #1
purejoker
- 10
- 0
Fourier series ...
Hi, everyone, I’m new to these forums. I’m just doing some work on Fourier analysis, and just have a few curious questions, I just need to clear up, and so I understand it better.
I have been playing around with the java applet for Fourier series from this website:
http://www.falstad.com/fourier/
check attachmebt...
My question:
The red line is meant to represent the synthesised signal, if the number of terms is set to zero, the red line is flat. But there is a white dot under cosines, and none at all under sines. Also if you place the cursor over the white dot in the cosines, it shows the magnitude. This also appears as zero.
What I don’t understand is why there is dot in the cosines and none in the sines, if the terms are set to zero shouldn’t they both have no dots? And why does the dot in the cosines have a magnitude zero?
I’m a bit confused about this can some help?
Thanks alots
Hi, everyone, I’m new to these forums. I’m just doing some work on Fourier analysis, and just have a few curious questions, I just need to clear up, and so I understand it better.
I have been playing around with the java applet for Fourier series from this website:
http://www.falstad.com/fourier/
check attachmebt...
My question:
The red line is meant to represent the synthesised signal, if the number of terms is set to zero, the red line is flat. But there is a white dot under cosines, and none at all under sines. Also if you place the cursor over the white dot in the cosines, it shows the magnitude. This also appears as zero.
What I don’t understand is why there is dot in the cosines and none in the sines, if the terms are set to zero shouldn’t they both have no dots? And why does the dot in the cosines have a magnitude zero?
I’m a bit confused about this can some help?
Thanks alots