The time shift property of the Fourier transform is defined as follows:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]x(n - n_o ) \Leftrightarrow e^{ - j\omega n_o } X(e^{j\omega } )[/itex]

I am confused by this notation....what does [itex]X(e^{j\omega } )[/itex] mean? I know that [itex]X(\omega)[/itex] is the value of the Fourier transform at a given angular frequency but I'm confused why it has been put in a complex exponent.

It is also sometimes written as:

[itex]h(x) = f(x - x_0)[/itex]

[itex]\hat{h}(\xi)= e^{-2\pi i x_0\xi }\hat{f}(\xi)[/itex]

This notation I think I understand...it's saying that, if I have the DFT of [itex]f(x)[/itex], then I can get the DFT for [itex]f(x - x_0)[/itex] by multiplying each point in the DFT by a scale factor that depends on the frequency. Specifically, from Euler's relation, I should scale the real/complex part by,

[itex]\cos(-2 \pi x_0 \xi ) + i \sin(2 \pi x_0 \xi )[/itex].

I tested this out by constructing a DFT that has a single spike, then taking the inverse FFT to reconstruct a time signal...and scaling the DFT spike and reconstructing again to see if I got a time shifted signal. I did not. When I thought about it more, I realized that this doesn't make sense, because some time shifts would result in multiplication by zero, which means that a shift followed by a negative shift could result in the signal being destroyed.

What have I got wrong?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fourier time shift

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**