- #1

- 458

- 0

x(t) = sin(4(t-1))

and I need to find X(jw), i.e. it's FT, so I am confused whether I shift by 1 or by 4, in other words whether I multiply F{sin(4t)} by e^(4jw) or by e^(1jw)

which one is it? I am thinking it's 4jw.... is it right?

- Thread starter EvLer
- Start date

- #1

- 458

- 0

x(t) = sin(4(t-1))

and I need to find X(jw), i.e. it's FT, so I am confused whether I shift by 1 or by 4, in other words whether I multiply F{sin(4t)} by e^(4jw) or by e^(1jw)

which one is it? I am thinking it's 4jw.... is it right?

- #2

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 956

I hope you will bear with me as I use "i" rather than "j". I just can't force myself to that heresy.

sin(4(t-1))= sin(4t- 4). Looks to me like you need to shift by 4.

- #3

- 458

- 0

:tongue2:HallsofIvy said:Aarg! Those engineers and their jmaginary numbers!

thanks

- #4

- 458

- 0

perhaps i should have started a different thread, but since HallsofIvy has mentioned, i couldn't help but ask: is there any tiniest difference between i and j, i.e. are we, engineers, underestimate imaginary numbers in some way?

It always comes up and i just would like to satisfy my curiosity.

- #5

- 6

- 0

There is no big deal in taking j instead of i for imaginary numbers. For engineers, 'i' represents current. To avoid confusion engineers take 'j' for imaginary part.

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 844

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 245

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 622

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 557

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 987