- #1

- 970

- 3

Doesn't the integral:

[tex]\int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{dx}{x} e^{-ikx} [/tex]

not converge because of x=0?

Yet for some reason analytical computer programs give a result despite the blow up.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter RedX
- Start date

- #1

- 970

- 3

Doesn't the integral:

[tex]\int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{dx}{x} e^{-ikx} [/tex]

not converge because of x=0?

Yet for some reason analytical computer programs give a result despite the blow up.

- #2

- 2,981

- 5

[tex]

P \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\frac{e^{i k x}}{x} \, dx} = i \pi

[/tex]

P \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\frac{e^{i k x}}{x} \, dx} = i \pi

[/tex]

- #3

- 970

- 3

[tex]

P \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\frac{e^{i k x}}{x} \, dx} = i \pi

[/tex]

Well if the Fourier transform of 1/x exists, it would make the most sense that it's the principal part.

However, can you really ignore what's going on at x=0 like that?

For example, can you reconstruct the function from the transform?

[tex]f(x)=\int \frac{dk}{2 \pi} (i \pi) e^{-ikx}=(i \pi)\delta(x)\neq1/x [/tex]

- #4

AlephZero

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 7,002

- 295

This is rather a subtle question. The answer probably depends on what you want to do with the FT when you have got it.

The FT is "defined", in the sense that sin(kx)/x is a well behaved integrable function everywhere except at when x = 0, and cos(kx)/x is an odd function so in some sense the integral from -infinity to +infinity must be 0, even though the integrals from -infinity to 0 and 0 to +infinity both diverge.

But as RedX implied, "here be mathematical dragons..." - though this sort of mathematical arm-waving is sometimes useful for discovering correct and useful results, which can be proved by other methods once they are known.

The FT is "defined", in the sense that sin(kx)/x is a well behaved integrable function everywhere except at when x = 0, and cos(kx)/x is an odd function so in some sense the integral from -infinity to +infinity must be 0, even though the integrals from -infinity to 0 and 0 to +infinity both diverge.

But as RedX implied, "here be mathematical dragons..." - though this sort of mathematical arm-waving is sometimes useful for discovering correct and useful results, which can be proved by other methods once they are known.

Last edited:

- #5

- 970

- 3

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=fourier+1/x

because depending on whether k in the exponential is positive or negative, you have to complete your contour in the upper or lower half respectively of the complex x-plane, i.e.:

[tex]

P \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\frac{e^{i k x}}{x} \, dx} = i \pi

[/tex]

[tex]

P \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\frac{e^{-i k x}}{x} \, dx} = -i \pi

[/tex]

So maybe there's a chance that 1/x is the inverse Fourier transform.

Share: