Fraunhofer intensity pattern

In summary, the same intensity pattern is obtained for a slit that is not centered at the origin, as long as the edges are parallel. The equation for the intensity pattern is the same, and this is physically reasonable because the diffraction pattern is determined by the edges of the slit, not its position.
  • #1
Qyzren
44
0

Homework Statement


Derive the equation describing the Fraunhofer intensity pattern from a single
slit of width b centered at the origin. Then show that the same intensity pattern is obtained for a slit that is not centred at the origin (i.e assume the slit edges are at x = a - b/2 and x = a + b/2). Is this physically reasonable? Discuss briefly.

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose the coordinates of P are (X, Y, Z), and the coordinates of a point Q on the aperture are (x, y,z) where z = 0.
http://img133.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picbe2.jpg
If the distance QP is d then.
http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pic2qv3.jpg
Now chuck that in
http://img224.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pic3fl2.jpg
to obtain
http://img81.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pic4lr2.jpg

now, how would i attempt the second part of the question?
would my d² = (X - (x+a))² + (Y-y)² + (Z-z)²
and L² = (x-a)² + Y² + Z² ??

meaning d² = L²[1 + (2ax + x² + y²)/L² - (2xX+2yY)/L²]
so d ~= L[1 - (2xX + 2yY)/L²] like earlier?

or am i doing it completely wrong?

Thank you all for your input.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
for your question! To show that the same intensity pattern is obtained for a slit that is not centered at the origin, we can use the same approach as before but with the new coordinates for the slit edges. So instead of using x = 0 for the center of the slit, we can use x = a for one edge and x = a + b for the other edge, as shown in the diagram below:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v111/bradleyveldman/slit.png

Using this new coordinate system, we can derive the same equation for the intensity pattern as before. So the final result would be:

I(θ) = [sin(πbθ/λ)]^2/[πbθ/λ]^2

where θ is the angle between the direction of the incident wave and the direction of the diffracted wave.

This result is physically reasonable because the intensity pattern is determined by the diffraction of the incident wave by the edges of the slit, not by the position of the slit itself. As long as the slit edges are parallel, the same diffraction pattern will be observed regardless of the position of the slit. This is because the diffraction pattern is a result of the interference of the waves diffracted from each edge, and the relative positions of the edges do not affect this interference.
 

What is Fraunhofer intensity pattern?

Fraunhofer intensity pattern refers to the diffraction pattern created when light passes through a narrow slit or aperture. It is characterized by a central bright spot surrounded by alternating bright and dark bands.

Who discovered the Fraunhofer intensity pattern?

The Fraunhofer intensity pattern is named after Joseph von Fraunhofer, a German physicist and optical scientist who discovered it in the early 19th century.

What factors affect the appearance of the Fraunhofer intensity pattern?

The appearance of the Fraunhofer intensity pattern is affected by the size of the slit, the wavelength of the light, and the distance between the slit and the screen on which the pattern is projected.

What is the significance of the Fraunhofer intensity pattern?

The Fraunhofer intensity pattern is important in understanding the behavior of light and the principles of diffraction. It has also been used in various applications such as in the design of optical instruments and in the study of molecules and crystal structures.

Is the Fraunhofer intensity pattern only observed with light?

No, the Fraunhofer intensity pattern can also be observed with other types of waves, such as sound waves and water waves, as long as they pass through a narrow opening or slit.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
864
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
844
Back
Top