Is Fritjof Capra Considered a Crackpot?

  • Thread starter Gold Barz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Crackpot
In summary: I was done. The Tao of Physics was so bad, I couldn't finish it.In summary, while The Web of Life may be Capra's best work, The Tao of Physics is weak, and Hidden Connections is good for its green arguments, the individual does not seem to know much about this guy.
  • #1
Gold Barz
467
0
I just want to know what the general consensus is on this guy before I really get into his stuff? Reading little excerpts on his stuff seems kind of borderline to me but maybe I am just over-thinking it?

PS: If this isn't the right forum to post this question then please feel free to move it to the appropriate section, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gold Barz said:
I just want to know what the general consensus is on this guy before I really get into his stuff? Reading little excerpts on his stuff seems kind of borderline to me but maybe I am just over-thinking it?

PS: If this isn't the right forum to post this question then please feel free to move it to the appropriate section, thanks.

Meh, I don't know much about him. Sounds like a smart guy who got a little kooky from thinking too hard. While maybe not an actual "crackpot" per se, I would be more inclined to read something by Sagan (or re-read it, as the case may be).
 
  • #3
The "Tao of Physics" is ancient history by physics standards and the philosophy isn't exactly a show stopper. You can do much better with other books.

However "The Turning Point" is more philosophical and considered by many a must read for left wing politics. It has some interesting theories about western civilization.
 
  • #4
Gold Barz said:
I just want to know what the general consensus is on this guy before I really get into his stuff? Reading little excerpts on his stuff seems kind of borderline to me but maybe I am just over-thinking it?

PS: If this isn't the right forum to post this question then please feel free to move it to the appropriate section, thanks.

I've never read any of his books, but I watched his movie a couple of times. I would characterize him, based on the movie, as a crackpot.

But I mean that in a good way of course. He's a crackpot in the sense that he's incomprehensible to the average human. He hangs around some website call http://www.ecoliteracy.org/" [Broken], whatever that means.

eco..economy... economy car... chevette.
liter.. stuff on the ground
racy.. opossite of chevette.

My guess is that it's a website about a junk yard where people collect stuff and make race cars out of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Having read all his books, he is not a crackpot but a rational populariser of systems science. Tao of Physics is the weakest even though it was a commercial hit. I like the Web of Life best because it is simply a potted history of systems science. Hidden Connections was good for its green arguments.
 
  • #6
apeiron said:
Having read all his books, he is not a crackpot but a rational populariser of systems science. Tao of Physics is the weakest even though it was a commercial hit. I like the Web of Life best because it is simply a potted history of systems science. Hidden Connections was good for its green arguments.

Thanks for the info, I've never heard of these books.
 
  • #7
The Web Of Life was probably the best book I've read this year. Capra brilliantly lays out the holistic view of the word, the systems science, and the scientists who advanced those fields.
 
  • #8
Generally speaking, Capra promotes quantum mysticism, which is more or less a bastardization of quantum mechanics. This is clearly visibly in books such as The Tao of Physics, where he appeals to accidental commonalities in language as if these where profound similarities or connections between reductionist science and eastern mysticism.
 
  • #9
What Capra try to do is Transdisciplinarity and I think represents the future for wise people...
 
  • #10
Mkorr said:
Generally speaking, Capra promotes quantum mysticism, which is more or less a bastardization of quantum mechanics. This is clearly visibly in books such as The Tao of Physics, where he appeals to accidental commonalities in language as if these where profound similarities or connections between reductionist science and eastern mysticism.

Seconded.
 
  • #11
FlexGunship said:
Seconded.

I thought you didn't know much about him. :confused:
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
I thought you didn't know much about him. :confused:

Rarely, when an individual realizes he knows nothing about something, that individual will learn. I got the The Hidden Connections at a used book store near work (I work near a college campus). I didn't get much farther than the 2nd chapter. Very "mushy" thinking; wishy-washy words. Lots of appeals to "reason."

I had to look at my poster of Carl Sagan to recover.

EDIT: Incidentally, I also got an awesome book on pre-Apollo era missile tests for like three bucks. There are some good stories/pictures in there. Can't recall the name, sadly. I'm at work.

DOUBLE EDIT: Capra lost me at his desire to push sciences towards "qualities" instead of "quantities." And when he started downplaying our understanding of biology as bringing us no closer to understanding life.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Gold Barz said:
I just want to know what the general consensus is on this guy before I really get into his stuff? Reading little excerpts on his stuff seems kind of borderline to me but maybe I am just over-thinking it?

PS: If this isn't the right forum to post this question then please feel free to move it to the appropriate section, thanks.
My interest in quantum physics also began with popularizations of it. What I've learned is that if you really want to understand it (qm) and how it's been developed, then you will have to learn the mathematical/physical bases of it. This entails going back to Planck and working forward. This will take some time, but it will be time well spent if you're intent on actually understanding how and why qm has evolved as it has.

I don't know if Fritjof Capra is a crackpot or not. I've read only a little bit of his stuff. But there is a tried and true method wrt learning and understanding the development of the quantum theory, and I don't think it has anything to do with Capra's stuff.

Read the original papers by Jordan, Heisenberg, etc.

Then read a good textbook on it.

Then ask some questions.
 
Last edited:

1. Who is Fritjof Capra and why is he referred to as a "crackpot"?

Fritjof Capra is an Austrian-born physicist and systems theorist. He has been labeled a "crackpot" by some for his controversial and unconventional ideas about the nature of reality and the role of science in society.

2. What are some of Fritjof Capra's most well-known theories?

Capra is most famous for his book "The Tao of Physics," which explores the parallels between Eastern mysticism and modern physics. He is also known for his work on systems thinking and the interconnectedness of all living things.

3. How have Capra's ideas been received by the scientific community?

Capra's ideas have been met with both praise and criticism from the scientific community. While some scientists appreciate his interdisciplinary approach and holistic perspective, others have criticized his theories as being unscientific and lacking evidence.

4. What is the controversy surrounding Fritjof Capra's ideas?

The controversy surrounding Capra's ideas stems from their departure from traditional scientific thinking. Some believe that his theories are too far-fetched and lack empirical evidence, while others see value in his unconventional perspectives.

5. How has Fritjof Capra's work influenced society?

Capra's work has had a significant impact on how society views the intersection of science and spirituality. He has also inspired new ways of thinking about interconnectedness and sustainability, which have had a lasting influence on fields such as environmentalism and social justice.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
836
Replies
9
Views
885
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
765
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
70
Views
5K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top