[SOLVED] Frivolous theorem of arithmetic on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frivolous_Theorem_of_Arithmetic There's a debate on whether we should delete this theorem from Wikipedia because some consider it "useless". Should it be deleted?
Yes.Edit this page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Frivolous_Theorem_of_Arithmetic Daniel.
Yes, add your comments (after voting keep or delete by following the format) on the bottom of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...n/Frivolous_Theorem_of_Arithmetic&action=edit
But that would raise the question on the "usefulness" of theorems. The way I see it is: if it's true, then it has to be said, no matter how trivial.
The entry on wikipedia is being deleted under the pretense that it is not "useful". But then, there are some theorems that are not "useful" which aren't being deleted.
"Useful" is a subjective term.Mathematics is the last place on Earth where u could have subjectivity... So let's drop it... Daniel.
Which is precisely why the entry should not be deleted under that pretense. But if you feel this way, you can go vote for deletion.
Surely you've encountered facts in science that was entirely useless, except that it improved your perspective on things?
I would not call it useless but a humerous reminder of the limitations of finite computations. It happens often enough, piles upon piles of numerical data suggest a function behaves a certain way then it's shown that it does exactly what we expect it not to do outside the range of our fancy computers (e.g. Mertens conjecture).
:rofl: That is the most weak theorem ever, i mean cmon the definitions used are so empty. I bet it isn't a mathematician who suggested that theorem. ( Maybe a physicist, they like to play with "large numbers" :tongue2: )
And does MathWorld? http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FrivolousTheoremofArithmetic.html Oh and please do prove for me rigoursly that 1+1=2, but that's an equation not really a theorem. You could describe every single number a physicist has ever used as small (I probabily would because I do a lot of cryptography) and still we know that most numbers are large, we have a nice theorem saying so What has that got to do with this at all?
Perhaps Wikipedia needs a section of "The most false theorems" as well: Here's mine: The primes are closed under multiplication..